User talk:Historyday01/Archive 9

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

All Stars F

I thought it was a good idea to remove character descriptions because it would make the article longer, but it's fine if you think it's a good idea to have them. 73.79.229.7 (talk) 16:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

I don't think the character descriptions make the article that much longer... and I think it could be good to have since this series brings so many characters from various PreCure series together. Historyday01 (talk) 18:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Okay. 73.79.229.7 (talk) 18:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Edelman Family Foundation

Hello @Historyday01

I am reaching out to you because of your previous participation in one of the discussions regarding the reliability and neutrality of HuffPost/Pink News/ProPublica as sources used on Wikipedia.

Currently, there is an ongoing issue with the Edelman Family Foundation section in the Joseph Edelman Wikipedia article. The section appears to be biased and lacks a balanced representation of the foundation's activities, as it primarily focuses on a single controversial donation while neglecting to mention the organization's numerous other significant contributions to various causes.

I would like to invite you to participate in the discussion on the BLP Noticeboard to address the concerns surrounding the section's neutrality and explore ways to improve its content. Llama Tierna (talk) 18:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Help

@Historyday01, Can you help me with your opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuuki (Sword Art Online Character), And look for more sources for the character just like you did in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asuna (Sword Art Online) The dogcat (talk) 05:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

ok Historyday01 (talk) 13:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of S.A.L.E.M.: The Secret Archive of Legends, Enchantments, and Monsters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S.A.L.E.M.: The Secret Archive of Legends, Enchantments, and Monsters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.A.L.E.M.: The Secret Archive of Legends, Enchantments, and Monsters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mdann52 (talk) 09:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Historyday01

Courtesy notice. I'm sincerely hoping that this is an enemy trying to impersonate you, rather than you doing this, and if so I believe an SPI is the only way to clear your name. Jclemens (talk) 17:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Definitely an enemy trying to stir up trouble. Thanks for the notice. Historyday01 (talk) 21:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 00:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

According to the block parameters, this edit on the talk page does not violate the block. So as it not cause any more discord, I will be complying with this one-month block, although it is making me very wary to create any pages in the future (or AfD discussions in general, unless absolutely necessary). Otherwise, it is more unfortunate that the AfD ended in a delete (I did expect that considering how the discussion had been going at that point). I do plan on, possibly, asking some of the discussion participants on how I should proceed from here after this month block has ended.Historyday01 (talk) 15:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SALEM Series cover photo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SALEM Series cover photo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)