User talk:Hmzawan6

Removing comments from WP:AN3[edit]

Hello Hmzawan6. Can you explain why you should not be blocked for disruption for removing others' comments from a report about you at WP:AN3? And for failing to respond to a question on whether you are a paid editor? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:56, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: he was asked twice, both times deleted it. I don't see any reason not to block. Doug Weller talk 18:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir @EdJohnston: It's me Hamza, Sir I think I should be blocked because I am here as a new member but more then I believe in contributing good and original thing and give my 100% into the wiki community and I am as the same as your, the only difference is you're a pro and senior here and right now I am just a beginner and learning thing and trying to give my best version into thing to make it good and original authentic. I know doing mistakes is a human error and once or maybe many times in life everyone makes a mistake as I did and yes I'm sorry for it as I respect you and I respect all the policies of Wikipedia. Hmzawan6 (talk) 09:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am accepting this that I am new here and my intention is just to do good nor bad but sometimes unconditionally things happen but to be very honest I didn't mention anywhere that I am a paid editor no never I know now all the policies of the wiki and yes being paid here is a crime here. Hmzawan6 (talk) 09:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As well as yes I made some edit on Waqar Zaka page because the information is given there was totally fake and false for evidence you can google it and this is the reason I've made an edit there but a guy named @Saqib: who is currently controlling many Wikipedia pages of Pakistan revert it back to the old version because he has some personal issue with Waqar Zaka this is the reason he is not making his page authentic with 100% true information. Sir @EdJohnston: I request you that kindly look into this matter and asked @Saqib: that why he is not doing this he is a contributor he has to make it correct as well as I request to the authorities to kindly look into this matter because I've noticed here that only contributors are biting newcomers. Hmzawan6 (talk) 09:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being WP:NOTHERE to help the encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 22:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hmzawan6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well, the reason is for do not block me that I am a newcomer here and my intention aren't bad as I want to be a contributor and give my good faith and honesty in it, yes I am accepting this that I made mistakes sometimes while learning and doing a new thing and I also believe in it that everyone makes mistakes it's and human error as the same I did a mistake while learning thing here on Wikipedia but I think if your guys and authorities give me a second chance then I promise the community that I won't disappoint you next time and I will be a good contributor in future this is just a start for me and I am a good learner and soon I make my skills better that's it now it's all up to the authorities and official to look into my matter Thankyou. Hmzawan6 (talk) 09:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request is incoherent. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:16, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have seen old diff[edit]

I have removed your talk page intro and User:Sahib is not sending "false messages". Also, how come you added changes to that article? 3125A^{Talk!_{Contributions!}} 21:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]