User talk:Hockeymikey

May 2018

August 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sasquatch t|c 19:17, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hockeymikey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Who put you in a position of power and let you abuse it? I don't know where you are coming from but whatever "reasons" you have are rubbish. I'm here contributing to the community and you seek to censor me. It's more than likely because I said something you didn't agree with. I expect more professional people to be in positions of power that are levelheaded and don't censor people. Appears you are just pushing an agenda if this is the route you wanna go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hockeymikey (talk • contribs)

Decline reason:

Requests that attack others are not considered. 331dot (talk) 20:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hockeymikey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No idea why I'm blocked. This whole reasoning is rubbish and smells fishy. I don't know what, I did and have been contributing to the community. I think some admin has made a mistake with this or had some possible malicious intent. No idea, it's all weird and I should be unblocked. No reason for me to be blocked. Hockeymikey (talk) 00:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If this helps, the block log entry says: "history of repeated personal attacks; WP:OWN; refuses to participate in discussions in any sort of constructive way". I have to agree with that assessment. Huon (talk) 00:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hockeymikey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm getting falsely claimed by many admins that I'm not "participating in discussions in any sort of constructive way." This is a straight up lie and is only attempts by certain admins to censor me. Maybe they don't like my opinions, but I am apart of this community and there is no reason for being blocked. I seek to contribute to it but here I am trying to get myself unblocked. Hockeymikey (talk) 00:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:38, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hockeymikey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please tell me why I should still be blocked? I have been making helpful contributions and input to the site for forever. I'm not super active but I do what I can. The list "issues" don't apply to me. I'm not disruptive to the site or causing damage. I make contributions that are good and helpful to the community. All of this seems to be stemming from a disagreement over some opinions I hold which is grossly unfair and a breach of powers that an admin should have. I challenge you to show me what I did wrong, but I did nothing. I seek to give good input every day, and I'm being censored for it. I don't know how this isn't convincing enough, unless the reviewer has an agenda and can't separate his duties and opinions. Hockeymikey (talk) 01:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, can't do it. You've not addressed the reason for your block. Disagreeing is one thing. I disagree with people all the time. The problem is you disagreed in a disagreeable manner. You might want to look at some of the messages you've removed and read them. Let's just say you don't seem to handle it well when anyone tries to explain a problem and how to correct it. This is the first of your responses I saw. This says it all. To quote a phrase, in your responses, you might heed your own advice. Here's another example from one of your unblock requests, No idea why I'm blocked. This whole reasoning is rubbish and smells fishy. As you do not understand the aspects of your behavior that lead to your being blocked, I would be foolhardy to think you would not continue. -- Deep fried okra 03:10, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Administrator note Great Ghu! This was your first talk page edit. I can't believe you said that to DoRD.-- Deep fried okra 03:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the behavior and if it ruffled any feather. The user in question started it. Doesn't excuse anything, but he should be reprimanded then too. In the end we settled it and went our ways. I'll keep the behavior more civil. No idea who this DoRD user is or have I seen that edit. Seems to be that someone had unauthorized access to my account, like my children or one of their friends. That was years ago so it's hard to say for sure. Hockeymikey (talk) 03:33, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you are now claiming that someone else accessed your account, it will need to remain blocked as compromised. 331dot (talk) 07:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You know we are talking about an incident from almost 9 years ago, correct? Hockeymikey (talk) 15:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How do I(or anyone) know if I am addressing the creator of this account or someone else who accessed it? How do I know you take steps to secure your account or not? I've already reviewed a request on this matter, so I won't review another. You are free to make another unblock request that will be reviewed by someone else. 331dot (talk) 15:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Compromised or not, a pattern has emerged and continues to the present. In your next unblock appeal, please address behavioral issues that, IMHO, began ab initio.-- Deep fried okra 17:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was literally 9 years ago. I've changed my password many times and my email. It's as secured as can be. You're talking over a decade, a lot changes. This is needless dwelling over nothing. Additionally, how do I not address it? I addressed it perfectly fine, yet you deny it because "it's not good enough". I don't know what else to say besides this is a very biased attack on myself for no reason. Persecution like under an authoritarian regime.

Since you don't seem interested in making another unblock request and addressing the concerns stated by Deepfriedokra, and you continue to engage in attacks, I have decided to remove your talk page access. Should you have a change of heart and decide to address your inappropriate behavior, you may use WP:UTRS to request unblock. However, if you make more of the same requests as you have made here, you may lose access to that avenue as well. 331dot (talk) 18:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry wrong. My leadership style is authoritative. Not authoritarian. Please review the WP:GAB before appealing at WP:UTRS. In brief, you need to 1) identify what you did wrong, 2) state what you would do differently, 3) avoid making such off-the-cuff observations that fail to address your problems and instead criticize others. -- Deep fried okra 19:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not motivated by hatred and bias, nor am I "power mad". I have better things I could be doing, I'm here because I believe in this project. I don't know you. I only know your behavior, which is all this is about. No more, no less. 331dot (talk) 19:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]