User talk:Hoez2Pimp

August 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Manway. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, The Nylons, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Man way 21:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cracker (pejorative). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Man way 21:13, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Honky, you may be blocked from editing. Man way 21:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You crackas done block me[edit]

I didn't do nuthin' wrong. Y'all need to quit bein' so racit, yo.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hoez2Pimp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dint know you wuz gonna consider my edits vandalism. I'm new to this here thing, and I thought you might could use the point of view of a Black man. Now I see that I goes ta be able to write like a white man. I'll give it a try but y'all gotta be patient with me. I ain't white.

Decline reason:

Vandalism habits are not related to race. Let us know when you're willing to start editing constructively rather than vandalising in a racist manner and then blaming it on a race you're almost certainly not. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 21:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Whatevah[edit]

Obviously you a bunch of racist crackas who don't want contributions from minorities on your honky-ass site. Hoez2Pimp (talk) 20:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hoez2Pimp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Will you ignant-ass honkies give a brotha a break? Hoez2Pimp (talk) 20:40, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sock with charming accounts such as User:Imgonnarapeyouupthebutt and User:Gayrapecureshomophobia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:50, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've never met anyone with either of those names in my life! Hoez2Pimp (talk) 21:06, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hoez2Pimp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I ain't no sockpuppet or whatevah. Y'all gotta unblock me. Right now I think you just blockin' me 'cuz you racist and you don't like that I'm a pimp.Hoez2Pimp (talk) 19:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Dear Mr. Hoez
I apologies wholeheartedly and unreservedly for any actions taken by my fellow administrators that gave you the impression we were judging you either by your career path or racial identity. As is readily apparent, pimping is a widely respected line of work whose noted performers include Mr. Donald Campbell and Robert Beck.
In actual fact, your block is more due to your inability to correctly use the English language; it is what we are calling white people, not what we be calling white people. I trust this has been instructive for you. Ironholds (talk) 19:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.