User talk:Holofcener

Conflict of interest and autobiography[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:37, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Mike! I am really confused! There have been many articles written about Lawrence Holofcener over the years in 3 countries. His sculpture and artistic careers are well-documented in both the UK and the US. I simply thought that having all of the information in one place, rather than Google, would be helpful. Shall I re-write the article and let Wikipedia decide for themselves. I had linked all of his public works as well in the bio. It was quite complete, if I do say so myself. Thanks for your advice. It has been most helpful!```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holofcener (talk • contribs) — Holofcener (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Your best bet is to request that an article be written by a neutral uninvolved third party. Such requests are filed at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:17, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! This is very helpful to me.````

Please indent using a colon - and you were talking to a roBOT! Kittybrewster ☎ 20:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to help, not criticise[edit]

Can you add references please - and avoid "peacock terms" unless referenced. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:56, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Kitty! I'll have to look up what peacock terms are and will delete them. There are many links to Holofcener's works, but I lost everything and have not had time to redo all the links. Also on Wikipedia there are many references to his works over the years. Do I need to link to all of them? Thanks for your help!````

Links directly to Wikipedia do not constitute sources; but those articles may themselves be sourced to articles that are of utility here. (By the way, you've still not got the hang of signing your posts; look like you aren't shifting, so you type ` instead of ~!) --Orange Mike | Talk 20:44, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Everything you have uploaded is copyright http://www.marypenley.com/artists/artist.php?artistid=2 That doesn't mean you can't use it but it does mean you must rewrite it. Kittybrewster ☎ 20:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look at "what links here" under Larry Holofcener. And be prepared to have your work savaged by other editors. Kittybrewster ☎ 21:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note also that marypenley.com is not going to be considered a reliable source, since it's a site dedicated to selling Holofcener's products. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:23, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The dearth here is certainly references from reliable sources. Reliable sources don't have to be on the internet but they must be inependant of the subject and not a casual reference. Kittybrewster ☎ 09:05, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who says the Upstairs at the Downstairs is famous? Highly acclaimed is another peacock and unencyclopedic term. Kittybrewster ☎ 10:50, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

idlta.com and answers.com are not reliable sources. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I recognise him as a renaissance man; I would like to meet him. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:14, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. We will be at the *********** Hotel (www.****.com) on the ************* where we lived for many years from the first of *****. Do be in touch! Thank you! How am I doing? Any better?Holofcener (talk) 19:24, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing fine. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Question: You say tht idlta.com can't be used as a reference. However, on the Applause page, it gives the reviews, etc. with names of newspapers and dates. I can't use that? Thanks for the extra help.Holofcener (talk) 19:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you can use the reviews +newspapers and dates as a source. But don't refer it to idlta.com - rather to the newspaper, which IS independent of you. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Goodness, can you tell I'm getting tired. Pardon the typos. Also you mention Mary Penley's website. I don't know where I have used her as a reference, and anything she has on her website came from us anyway.Holofcener (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you quoted from her website and she coprighted it. that makes it a copyvio. And as you say it came from you which is not a reliable source. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Next question: Where have I used her as a source?Holofcener (talk) 19:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sculptor sectiion. direct quote. and the robots will pick up on it. and have. probably modified enogh now. Kittybrewster ☎ 20:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]