Jump to content

User talk:Hon203

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Hon203, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 08:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 08:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Sitam E Milli, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Articles such as this violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:30, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Sitam E Milli (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:50, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Sitam E Milli. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Evb-wiki 18:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Sitam E Milli, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft7b69p12h&doc.view=content&chunk.id=ch03&toc.depth=1&anchor.id=0&brand=ucpress. As a copyright violation, Sitam E Milli appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Sitam E Milli has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Sitam E Milli and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Sitam E Milli with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Sitam E Milli.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Evb-wiki 18:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. -- Behnam 21:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Ahmad Zahir. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ChrisLamb 21:30, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

continue reverting Articles, you will be blocked. --Anoshirawan 21:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I agree that both you and Anoshirawan have engaged in edit warring on Ehsan Aman. Since you are new user, I will simply warn you not to re-engage in this behavior, but instead resolve disputes through WP:CONSENSUS. If you engage in edit warring again, you will be blocked. Ronnotel 03:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration[edit]

I've removed your arbitration request as this dispute is a very long way from arbitration level. Please see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution and settle on one of the earlier methods of resolving disputes. Thanks. Picaroon (t) 02:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SITAMI[edit]

What is SITAMI? You mentioned it in an edit summary on 30 September 2007. I too have had trouble with editors who seem to ignore reason and Wikipedia consensus, and keep inserting things like Afghanistani for Afghan. --Bejnar 18:57, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]