User talk:HotTomatoe

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, HotTomatoe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 11:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi HotTomatoe! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Profanity/curse words, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Urban Eden

With regret, I will have to undo a lot of your changes to Urban Eden because of Wikipedia's policy WP:primary sources. An organisation's view of itself is not a WP:reliable source. You need to find third part sources to cite.

Also, if you are a member of Urban Eden, you can't edit that article at all, see WP: Conflict of interest. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On closer inspection, it wasn't as significant as it first seemed. It is reasonable to use an organisation's own web site to confirm what it says about itself. More seriously, the article is very out if date so needs updating or rewriting in past tense as history (and maybe appending to History of Milton Keynes? John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@John Maynard Friedman: Hey, please look into my contributions or on the Page History of Urban Eden. I have only so far made minor/maintenance edits, eg. adding categories, adding a bullet, formatting; I have removed a seemingly primary source of Urban Eden, and that's that only source-related edit I made that I can remember. I have not placed any citations in the article. If you think one of my edits are not in line with Wikipedia's policy, please state which part I made a mistake I'd love to hear it, because as far as I know I have not placed any sources, be it primary or secondary, on the page. I am aware of COI. Please carefully look into my recent edits and let me know your thoughts. HotTomatoe (talk) 09:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may have noticed that in the end I didn't actually undo anything of any significance. (I should maybe have said in my second note above that I was withdrawing my concern.) The citations of Urban Eden's website were in support of things it says about itself, so are reasonable and sensible to use. I suspect that if you did find something on the Citizen, they would have got it from UE's website anyway so a different citation would just be cosmetically different. Your contributions were fine, no issues. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 09:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi HotTomatoe! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, "Failed verification" template, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Mail reference at Sasha Allen

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Sasha Allen. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:04, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi HotTomatoe! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, inline citations, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Yoodaba per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yoodaba. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 20:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]