User talk:Hotguy2288altacc

August 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from WWE SmackDown with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 00:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WWE SmackDown. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: WWE SmackDown was changed by Hotguy2288altacc (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959451 on 2015-08-31T01:25:14+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:25, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WWE SmackDown. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. IF you contintue, you may be blocked from editing. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 01:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to WWE SmackDown. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wayne Dyer.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Wayne Dyer was changed by Hotguy2288altacc (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966023 on 2015-08-31T01:28:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your vadalism now or be blocked. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 01:31, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hotguy2288altacc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im Sorry for Vandalism i wont do it again I Didnt knew there was a rule

Decline reason:

Whether you knew there was a rule or not, it is quite obvious that you did not come here to build an encyclopedia. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:03, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're only sorry you got caught. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 06:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason to ask for you to be unblocked when you did so much vandalism. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 06:44, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:03, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Hotguy2288altacc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I completely forgot that I vandilised an entire page back in 2015, I also forgot that I even had a an wikipedia account I was only 12 when I made an account and vandilised and now I'm 19. I do feel geniuely sorry for vandilising an entire page, I was immature back then and I maybe thought that it would had been funny doing that for fun. I admit it wasnt the right thing to do and it wasnt the smartest of me. But my intentions now years later is to actually build an encyclopedia, post and interact here. I saw that someone said years ago I was sorry because I was caught well uh I was only 12 and I didn't know how to actually build a request so my only words were "sorry I didn't know the rules". I do know the rules now and I promise I will follow the rules, I know its been a while since my blocked but I was just wondering where my account was like two days ago to find out that I was blocked. The vandlisiming thing won't happen again as I have aged and mature, I do want to build an encylopedia and I hope I could get my account unblocked and build an enclyopedia.Hotguy2288altacc (talk) 16:39, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I'll assume good faith and happily take you at your word here. The original blocking admin hasn't edited in almost a month so I'll just lift the block unilaterally, given the time that has passed here. Please familiarise yourself with WP:5P. Welcome back and happy editing! Yamla (talk) 17:30, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]