User talk:Houston,illinois

January 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Skinwalker Ranch, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Skinwalker Ranch, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Ashley yoursmile! 14:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your repeated deletion of that article section: if you are trying to split the section off into its own article, please discuss it at this section of the article Talk page. You may need some assistance. - LuckyLouie (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Skinwalker Ranch shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 16:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 19:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Houston,illinois! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Liance were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

No changes to references since last submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Skinwalker Ranch, you may be blocked from editing. Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 16:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not continue deleting AfC decline notices (as you already have with two) without making any significant changes to your draft. This wastes reviewers' time and will not increase the chances of an acceptance in any way.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Draft:The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch. Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 16:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Java Hurricane 08:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Talk pages

See the message I left on the talk page of the other account you use. [1]. - LuckyLouie (talk) 03:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit while logged out - I'm blocking you until you find this talk page and agree

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 17:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for editing for logged out, ignoring warnings on this page and IP page.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 17:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Houston,illinois (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my account was left open and my brother got into it. He made the spamms while I was away taking care of my parents. I found out yesterday, and now I request to be unblocked. I have added new passowrds and security measures to protect my account. I am very trustworthy, as I used to be an administrator on Fandom. (I quit due to heavy demands) Houston,illinois (talk) 00:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Both WP:BROTHER and WP:COMPROMISED enter into play here. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Houston,illinois (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, the real reason I did this is beacuse I had a tough break-up and I layed it all on wikipedia by accident. I apologise and promise not to ever do it again. My relation to Tic TawCentral, Waussus and Oas and Cream is different accounts. I was new to online stuff and I now see that sockpuppetry in wrong. In future, I can definitely, after getting some expierience, see myself contributing that draft: the secret of skinwalker ranch, as it was the sole reason. I know that there are lotos of fans of the show who would like to see a straightforward index that it is.Houston,illinois (talk) 04:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am interpreting you use of a nonexistent "delete account" template as a withdrawal of this request. Accounts cannot be deleted, for technical and legal reasons; just abandon the account if you no longer wish to participate here. If you change your mind, please make another request. 331dot (talk) 11:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What's your relation to TicTawCentral, Waussus, and Oatsandcream? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please also tell what constructive edits you would like to make, why you lied about the use of your account, and why we should trust you won't deal with personal problems by taking them out on Wikipedia in the future. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch (January 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Chetsford was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Chetsford (talk) 18:15, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I assumed everyone would hate it...

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Houston,illinois (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been instructed to make this request in order to get unblocked on IP address User talk:174.3.212.76. The reason to be unblocked on that address is because I have officially reassessed my life and acknowledge I went "Puppet" and "Edit" happy. I am sorry, and promise to not make another nonconstructive edit again. I beg. The only edit I beg to make is on Draft:The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch. I never meant to cause widespread terror.

Decline reason:

You haven't addressed your use of other accounts, why you lied, or assure us that you won't take your personal problems out on Wikipedia in the future. As such, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch

Hello, Houston,illinois. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]