User talk:Hr168407

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Hr168407! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! MTHarden (talk) 04:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Week 2 assignments[edit]

I've graded your critique and reference that you added to James W. Pennebaker. It seems like that is your first choice for an article to improve and that is fine with me, although you were supposed to list articles on your user page first. --MTHarden (talk) 15:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Week 3 Assignments[edit]

You are now late in completing these assignents: Select an article by listing it on the assignment page, compile a bibliography of at least 3 good sources and list them in the talk page of your article, and create a sandbox version of your article. I'll still award you some credit if you get them done this week. Be sure to post on my talk page (in the Week 3 section) after you've completed the assignments. --MTHarden (talk) 16:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I thought you might like to know in case you didn't watchlist it that I further improved this page, using the 2 articles about him that were in the External links (he's attracted an unusual amount of press, those are good sources) and a couple of literature searches. I notice that in the Good Article Review, more about his personal motivation was requested, but I don't think that's advisable in the case of a living person who doesn't freely share such info on the record. If you want, I suggest you resubmit the article for reevaluation once summer vacations are over and more editors in the field are active. Just my opinion, though, and I don't do Good Article stuff myself :-) In any case, thanks for your efforts and I hope you continue to edit. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions about what is rather a labyrinthine enterprise. --Yngvadottir (talk) 13:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]