User talk:Hunington-Horstachio

This is Hunington Horstachio and I want to control Wikipedia.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Hunington-Horstachio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ~Richmond96 t • c 02:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lions Gate Entertainment

I found it necessary to revert your edits to Lions Gate Entertainment as unsupported original research You did not provide an edit summary and the linked articles you added indicated no relationship with Lions Gate Entertainment. If you can support your edit with a valid reference (WP:RS), feel free to add back your edits, but I would also recommend adding a reference in the link articles showing the relationship to Lions Gate Entertainment. Thank you for your participation in Wikipedia Dbiel ^(Talk) 03:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Philips subsidiaries

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Philips subsidiaries, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Philips subsidiaries is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Philips subsidiaries, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Entertainment Group

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Imperial Entertainment Group, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.closinglogos.com/page/Imperial+Entertainment+Group. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page.

CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Imperial Entertainment Group

A tag has been placed on Imperial Entertainment Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 04:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Gr1st (talk) 19:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

I suspect you to be a sock of

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Bambifan101 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

, but your edits are anyway a clear indication of failure to follow WP practice and process. LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ, i think he's a sockpuppet of indef blocked Cody Coyote. Elbutler (talk) 01:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]