User talk:Hythonia

This is Hythonia's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Niedzielski has been accepted[edit]

Adam Niedzielski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 15:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Osran's Armor[edit]

The article Osran's Armor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a hoax. There is no author named "Szymon Jan Osran", there is no book named "Filozofia kłótni", there is no essay named "Trochę o niezgodzie".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Thjarkur (talk) 17:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Osran's Armor[edit]

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Osran's Armor. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 18:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is entirely fair. The page was partly meant to be a hoax, but for the most part it was a test article. It was not meant to misinform anybody, nor did I mean for it to become public; I forgot to switch to my sandbox while creating it. I tried to add the speedy deletion notice when I noticed, but you got there before I could. I'm sorry — this won't happen again. --Hythonia (talk) 19:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amber Gold (company) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amber Gold (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Gold (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mozzcircuit (talk) 08:27, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]