User talk:I99jonma

This is I99jonma's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome![edit]

Hi I99jonma! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Swedish Double-decker has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Swedish Double-decker. Thanks! Ca ^{talk to me!} 10:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've answered your comment in the article. Was a while since I edited wikipedia and I am not up to date with the comment system but I hope you got a notice about the answer I99jonma (talk) 10:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I read your comment–no worries then, my concerns were unfounded. Thanks for replying! Ca ^{talk to me!} 10:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swedish Double-decker (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

With such sparse referencing (three sources, each cited only once), it's difficult to know how much of this information comes from each of the sources (or for that matter how much doesn't come from any of them), but judging by the previous comment this seems to be a case of publishing the content on an external website, and then creating a Wikipedia draft based on the same. I think that constitutes original research, and doesn't really reflect a range of views as Wikipedia articles should. We need to see what multiple independent and reliable sources have said about this topic, and the draft needs to reflect a number of such sources, not only or mainly one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Swedish Double-decker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved the referencing. One challenge is that older sources in the subject are very brief or has proven to be inaccurate. Newer published sources are written by me and are published in magazines in swedish and not available online. Thus my webpage, which has been around since 2010, is the most accurate source of information on the subject and also the only available source in english.

My main reason for writing this article now is that I want to edit the following article Låtfiol - Wikipedia, which has been there for a long time and is full of errors or almost completely wrong. Rather than just deleting that article I would like to rewrite it or comment the errors since there is a common misconception that Låtfiol is something that exists and that it is based on older instrument while the fact is that it was created in the 1980s (and thus maybe today could be classified as an existing instrument model even though it has no older history than the 1980s). In order to rewrite that article it would be much easier if it existed an article about the only type of Swedish violins with sympathetic strings that actually exists in the form of preserved older instruments I99jonma (talk) 14:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I99jonma! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swedish Double-decker (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

With regard to similarities between the text and http://en.resoneramera.se please lodge your ownership of the text there with WP:VRT and assert your ownership the copyright and that you have licenced it for onward use, OR change the copyright statement on that site to reflect the licecnig needed by Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Swedish Double-decker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't really get how I should do with the Wikipedia:VRT. The article is not very similar to the text on the webpage that is referenced, it is completely written from scratch but both have the same author. I thought it was ok but if needed I can "lodge ownership" or similar. I99jonma (talk) 14:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is worth lodging permission "just in case" unless the words are significantly different. Enough similarities make it look like close paraphrasing. The instrument looks interesting and I would like to see the draft accepted, assuming it passes WP:GNG. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swedish Double-decker (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Swedish Double-decker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swedish Double-decker has been accepted[edit]

Swedish Double-decker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]