User talk:IAm172.16.100.1

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Use of an IP address suggests intent to create confusion about identity. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just double checked the name policy and it seems like the only mention of IP addresses is: "Some users choose to make usernames based on their static IP addresses, but this is not recommended" (emphasis mine). Hence, it seems like it should be ok per that guideline. The IP address, of course, is a private IP address (from the lesser know private 172.[16-31].* range), so it is a form of a nerdy pun (i.e., anonymous, but not anonymous). I also explicitly put "IAm" before it to show that it's not an IP address (rather then something that would be deceptive, such as _172.168.100.1 or I72.168.100.1).

AfD nomination of Jim Tucker

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jim Tucker, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Tucker. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Artw (talk) 22:19, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This account, IAm172.16.100.1, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username contains an IP address, something which can be misused to give a misleading impression regarding user identity; moreover, it's an RFC 1918 address that cannot be routed on the public Internet.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

-- The Anome (talk) 11:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IAm172.16.100.1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just double checked the name policy and it seems like the only mention of IP addresses is: "Some users choose to make usernames based on their static IP addresses, but this is __not recommended__" (emphasis mine). Hence, it seems like it should be ok per that guideline. The IP address, of course, is a private IP address (from the lesser know private 172.[16-31].* range), so it is a form of a nerdy pun (i.e., anonymous, but not anonymous). I also explicitly put "IAm" before it to show that it's not an IP address (rather then something that would be deceptive, such as _172.168.100.1 or I72.168.100.1).

Decline reason:

{{subst:I'm sorry, but implying that you have a public IP address that is, in fact, an untraceable RFC 1918 address appears to me to be (whether deliberately or not) potentially misleading. This does not appear to be the first such account you have created today: see User:I am 172.17.86.194. You are still welcome to edit here, if you want to create a new account with another name; it's easy, so why not just go ahead and do it?}} The Anome (talk) 02:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.