User talk:ISTJester

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sock puppet of Cognition.
Please refer to editing habits, contributions and/or any sockpuppetry investigations for evidence.
This policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs – abuse log

Regarding Lyndon LaRouche[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! Sango 123 17:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing content unfavorable to LaRouche does not constitute NPOV. Sango 123 18:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sango 123 18:27, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sango 123 18:29, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insert the political view of LaRouche into unrelated articles. -Will Beback 21:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per the ArbCom:

Original work which originates from Lyndon LaRouche and his movement may be removed from any Wikipedia article in which it appears other than the article Lyndon LaRouche and other closely related articles.[1].

Political views of Lyndon LaRouche is a suitable place to cover LaRouche's theories. Continuing to add those views to unrelated articles is disruptive, and you may be blocked if you don't stop. -Will Beback 01:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Spannaus[edit]

Please do not remove the Wikipedia: Articles for Deletion notice while the discussion is going on. KleenupKrew 23:30, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]