Jump to content

User talk:ITLRosanna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi ITLRosanna! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 02:50, Sunday, November 26, 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dancewave (December 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! ITLRosanna, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As a response to your e-mail, and here's what I can give as advice. Firstly, the draft reads too much like an advertisement. As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it is expected that articles present the subject matter in a neutral manner. Thus, promotional tones should almost always be avoided. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I have edited the article as requested and resubmitted it - can you confirm that you are able to view the changes? @Narutolovehinata5:

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dancewave (February 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NottNott was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-NottNott 23:03, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dancewave has been accepted

[edit]
Dancewave, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 03:22, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vic Sage (feedback)

[edit]

Unfortunately at this time Spotify's viral 50 chart and Apple Music's top 100 chart are not considered to be notable chart references. Because Apple Music is a music download site and retail sites are not considered to be independent sources (i.e. their primary purpose is to sell the artist's music) - all it can be used for is to verify a song was released electronically on a specific date - nothing more. This in itself doesn't add anything to the argument whether the artist is notable or not.

I would try and find non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the artist. Interviews with the artist are also not considered independent (in fact without any independent verification they are generally considered to be a primary source). Blogsites (such as Dead End Hip Hop) and social media are not considered acceptable sources either, as they have no independent editorial oversight - so avoid those as well.

If you are able to come up with some suitable reliable secondary sources - let me know and I'd be happy to review the draft again. Dan arndt (talk) 01:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi ITLRosanna! You created a thread called Blog verses news site at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi ITLRosanna! You created a thread called How can I get the status of an article I published? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Vic Sage (November 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Otr500 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Otr500 (talk) 12:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vic Sage, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vic Sage

[edit]

Hello, ITLRosanna. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vic Sage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]