User talk:Iamtheswales

Welcome!

Hello, Iamtheswales, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like /alexiamtheswalesweeswithnohands, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! andy (talk) 23:45, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of /alexiamtheswalesweeswithnohands[edit]

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 23:45, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

This is the only warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GDonato (talk) 23:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism only account and making personal attacks. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. GDonato (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i have no idea how to talk on this site, so im editing this. i feel you have unfairly blocked me, as all i was trying to do was have a laugh with a friend my making a joke page. he has seen it now and i am not bothered what happens to the page, although i would be greatly thankful to be unblocked as i use wikipedia a lot and if i can make any amendment to a page, i will.

As stated in your block message type {{unblock|<Your reason here>}} if you wish to appeal. GDonato (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamtheswales (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am sorry for my actions

Decline reason:

I am sorry that this doesn't provide a reason to unblock you. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamtheswales (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i feel you have unfairly blocked me, as all i was trying to do was have a laugh with a friend my making a joke page. he has seen it now and i am not bothered what happens to the page, although i would be greatly thankful to be unblocked as i use wikipedia a lot and if i can make any amendment to a page, i will.

Decline reason:

We rather consistently block people who are using Wikipedia to "have a laugh". Find another place to play if you can't resist the temptation to vandalize. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This was far from "vandalism" if thats what you want to call it