User talk:Ian Beynon

License tagging for Image:Activediffwiki.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Activediffwiki.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:04, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Your addition to the general relativity article[edit]

Ian -

First of all, welcome to Wikipedia. It is good to have someone else involved who is interesting in general relativity.

Secondly here are some useful link for newcomers to Wikipedia:

Thirdly, there is the business of your new section in the general relativity article: "Einstein on Background independence - 'Beyond my wildest expectations'". A Wikipedia guideline says "don't bite the newcomer", but even so I cannot let that section stay there. It is trivial with respect to the overall article, undocumented, and full of personal musings. However, the part on the "hole argument" is useful, and I would like to see it transfered to the article called hole argument and refined there.

So kindly accept my apologies in you feel bitten. I assure you that I am willing to work with you to add to the content of this encyclopedia, but you need to work with what is already present. You also would be well advised to review what Wikipedia is not. Thank you much, EMS | Talk 21:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Hole2wiki.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hole2wiki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:16, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hole argument[edit]

Hey, do you have any idea what you're doing to the history of the Hole argument article?!? :-)

But seriously, thanks very much for your contributions. Hopefully when the article settles down a bit, you can start using edit summaries and batching your minor edits together so it's easier for the rest of us to follow what you're doing. --Doradus 18:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Holewiki.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Holewiki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Activediffwiki.jpg[edit]

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Activediffwiki.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Wikipedia:Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 21:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]