User talk:Ibrahimovws

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ibrahimovws, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as SakitMammadov, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! NeemNarduni2 (talk) 11:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SakitMammadov[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SakitMammadov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 11:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with SakitMammadov. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 12:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Alven Rosenberg (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ibrahimovws (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've only got one wiki account with my own email address. unblocked me Ibrahimovws (talk) 11:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on the editing patterns/interests, these do seem to be the same accounts. only (talk) 11:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ibrahimovws (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I repeat: I have one account, by which I created several Wiki-pages as: https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%85%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0%D1%80_%D0%92%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B5 https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A7%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%B7_%D0%90%D0%B1%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%98%D0%B5%D0%B2 I ask you to unblock me or give me objective reasons of locks Thanks P.S. In addition, I would like to note that I was asked to create a page of a WORLD famous artist-painter Sakit Mammadov, but administrators do not explain to me the reasons for refusing to publish the page, although the identity of the outstanding and award-winning, as evidenced by many references and sources Ibrahimovws (talk) 12:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In addition to sockpuppetry, we also prohibit meatpuppetry. There's no reason to unblock you if you're only here to create an article about a non-notable person who rented a booth in a shopping mall exhibition. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ibrahimovws (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"non-notable person" can present his works at the Louvre Museum? http://azerbaijanamericaalliance.org/news/louvre-showcases-paintings-of-legendary-azerbaijani-painter I have mare official links thats confirm artist achievement for wiki. In addition, even the placement of articles which does not fit the rules of the wiki is not a pretext for blocking the user. request to reconsider the decision. Ibrahimovws (talk) 16:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The Carrousel du Musee de Louvre is a shopping mall in the underground passage between the museum and the Metro. It is not within the museum and does not form part of the art collection. Booths in the carrousel can be hired, by artists among other commercial ventures. But you are blocked for sockpuppetry, which is the issue you must address in any future unblock request.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It is indeed a "pretext" to block a user when they repeatedly try to use Wikipedia to promote themselves despite being told notable times to stop. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]