User talk:Icedevil6

Your message[edit]

I'm sorry I believe you are mistaken in who deleted your word/article or something or other. I am not in a position to delete anything as I am not an admin. I have looked at your editing history and can find little or no areas where we may have crossed, except where I voted to keep on an AfD for shock sites. Please do not make accusations when you have a problem and always assume good faith in your messages. If you can provide me with diffs for your problems then maybe I can investigate further. Regards Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 22:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ah I see the problem you mistook me for Trödel here, easy mistake to make. Regards Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 22:43, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fomp entry[edit]

You deleted my entry for 'fomp' because it qualified as a dictionary term? In all actuality I specifically added that it had no place in a dictionary as it was a questionable word with multiple meanings and a background. You deleted it much too soon and without hesitation. --Icedevil6 21:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if the word is verifiable, but it looks like clear nonsense. And a quick google search resulted in no legitimate use other than as an acronym. Additionally you failed to assert why it should be on wikipedia see Speedy deletion reason #7 (abbr A7). Finally, the reference you provided in the article admitted that there is no reference from which to derive a meaning or history of the word. --Trödel 01:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't see any evidence of verifiablity from reliable sources - please see these policies and What Wikipedia is not to understand the standards for creating articles on wikipedia. If, after reading them, you still disagree, let me know and I'll request a review of my actions by other (3rd party) admins. --Trödel 03:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because I won't be around for a bit, I requested a review of my action and the reviewer concurred. Sorry I didn't notice you were a new user before. Please view this deletion as a learning experience of the standards here on wikipedia - see below for a proper welcome: --Trödel 05:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Dear Icedevil6: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Vaubin 12:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Older peter listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Older peter. Since you had some involvement with the Older peter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]