User talk:Icevirgo99

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Lilkimpic.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Lil kim teddy bear.jpg. The copy called Image:Lil kim teddy bear.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 02:14, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lilkimpic.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lilkimpic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:23, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Good Job.

Well done. IHelpWhenICan (talk) 02:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!! Icevirgo99 (talk) 04:10, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

IP Rumours

If an IP doesn't cite it, delete it. Don't even put things like, "Maybe", or "Allegedly". Just delete it. IHelpWhenICan (talk) 12:36, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

The Rise and Fall of Danity Kane

I removed that because all it does is recount what the Danity Kane Wikipedia article already says and is speculation on why they broke up. It is no different in essence to what the Rumors of disbandment, Departure of Aubrey O'Day and D.Woods, and End of group sections say. Besides that, it makes the article unnecessarily longer.

If you really want it in the article that badly, then take it to the talk page so that we can get consensus on if it should be included and how to word it in a way that it is not too redundant to what the article already says. Flyer22 (talk) 23:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

See the Danity Kane talk page. Stop injecting all this redundant information into the article.

On another note, when you start a new section on a talk page, it should be at the bottom of the talk page, not at the top. There is even a tab that you can click at the top of the talk page to start a new section. Flyer22 (talk) 23:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

As I stated on my talk page and the Danity Kane talk page, I compromised with you by adding in a bit of the information that is not redundant -- the part about the friendship cliques and insecurities. But the rest of that section is not needed. Flyer22 (talk) 01:09, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

I responded one more time on my talk page. I'm not sure if you were going to check my talk page again, so that's why I'm letting you know here. As my talk page says, though, I always respond there if a message that needs a response is left for me there. Flyer22 (talk) 02:44, 2 May 2009 (UTC)