User talk:Iffy/Archives/2020
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Excellent Job
I was just about to add the ITF profile to the Andreescu article. However, Grand Slam titles are not awarded by the WTA, according to most sources. The WTA citation is contradicted by other neutral, reliable sources in the Grand Slam article. I don't think that should be the one used in the info box. I propose changing it. -- James26 (talk) 18:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Hoge Tyler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Tyler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Royal family
Ok you are an idiot Harry is no longer Prince Harry and Meghan Is no longer the Duchess of Sussex so if you are too stupid to understand that please do not create fake news. They quit being royals. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8211825/Prince-Harry-drops-royal-surname-leaving-Britain-California-wife-Meghan-Markle.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prepstarr25 (talk • contribs) 05:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- They are still members of the royal family and still have their royal titles, so the page should stay as it is. Also, your source only claims that he dropped HRH and Mountbatten-Windsor, which is unrelated to our content dispute. Iffy★Chat -- 08:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
| Your feedback is requested at Talk:White supremacy on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |  |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 07:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
| Your feedback is requested at Talk:Taiwan on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 07:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
| Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tripartite Pact on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
David Jack (footballer)
Re the non-admin close at Talk:David Jack (footballer)#Requested move 6 July 2020. Non-admin closes should be performed only when the consensus is clear. Please revert and allow an admin to close. -- JHunterJ (talk) 15:48, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- @JHunterJ: I have performed many RM closures and am very familiar with the ins and outs of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Do you have any issue with my closure other than that it was closed by a non-admin? Iffy★Chat -- 16:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yes. There was no consensus, and certainly not a clear one, so shouldn't be performed by a non-admin WP:RMNAC, which is my principal issue with the close and why it should be reverted and left to an admin to close. As far as familiarity with WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, which you've brought up here, the long-term significance arguments (and the page views arguments) were presented by the opposers, but you introduced "we don't have to choose" as an argument in your close and decided to go with the supporters, which looked more like "what I think of" arguments. -- JHunterJ (talk) 17:37, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- @JHunterJ: There is no single method of weighing the primary topic criteria, so if there is a winner in usage, and a winner in long-term significance (or if there is no clear winner in one criteria but a winner in the other), then it is up to the community to decide how they should be weighed. Members of the community clearly disagree on how they should be weighed, but long-term significance arguments were made by the Supporters of the move:
No indication that the 1920s footballer left such an oversized footprint upon the game
Not overwhelmingly better known than the others, two of whom were so prominent that they were knighted.
We have a six-way DAB including two knights of the realm and an award-winning musician currently on the road, and yet some old hands still think a footballer who died fifty years ago is...
. Nobody is disputing thatThe footballer has long-term significance
, but whether the usage and long-term significance primary topic criteria weighed strongly enough in favour of the footballer to make him the primary topic, and on that question I found that there was a consensus that there is no primary topic. Iffy★Chat -- 18:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)- My request wasn't to rehash the discussion. Per WP:RMNAC, please revert your non-admin closure of an RM that hadn't reached clear consensus and wait for an admin to close it. -- JHunterJ (talk) 18:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- I do not consider the discussion contentious enough to require an admin to close it instead of a non-admin who is experienced and familiar with the policies involved, so no, I will not be reverting my closure. You are free to take this to WP:MRV if you want to take this further. Iffy★Chat -- 18:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- My request wasn't to rehash the discussion. Per WP:RMNAC, please revert your non-admin closure of an RM that hadn't reached clear consensus and wait for an admin to close it. -- JHunterJ (talk) 18:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- @JHunterJ: There is no single method of weighing the primary topic criteria, so if there is a winner in usage, and a winner in long-term significance (or if there is no clear winner in one criteria but a winner in the other), then it is up to the community to decide how they should be weighed. Members of the community clearly disagree on how they should be weighed, but long-term significance arguments were made by the Supporters of the move:
- Yes. There was no consensus, and certainly not a clear one, so shouldn't be performed by a non-admin WP:RMNAC, which is my principal issue with the close and why it should be reverted and left to an admin to close. As far as familiarity with WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, which you've brought up here, the long-term significance arguments (and the page views arguments) were presented by the opposers, but you introduced "we don't have to choose" as an argument in your close and decided to go with the supporters, which looked more like "what I think of" arguments. -- JHunterJ (talk) 17:37, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Move review for David Jack (footballer)
An editor has asked for a Move review of David Jack (footballer). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. JHunterJ (talk) 11:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Angela Buxton
On 21 August 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Angela Buxton, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 04:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Millennials on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Names and titles of God in the New Testament on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Frankfurt School on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Namespace on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholic on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rumi on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign endorsements on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Orgone on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Barkeep49 (talk) 18:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)