User talk:Ijustcomeinsometimesbuddy

This is Ijustcomeinsometimesbuddy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Burkhill (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jdcomix was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Burkhill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jdcomix (talk) 21:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ijustcomeinsometimesbuddy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jdcomix (talk) 21:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please do not be too heavy-handed in removing unsourced text. The first step in challenging material is to add a note saying that more references should be found; and then, ideally, for you to look for sources yourself, to improve the article. You don't appear to have done that, so I've reverted your changes at Billy J. Kramer and added a note that more references are needed. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:02, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Micky Dolenz did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! - FlightTime (open channel) 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]