User talk:Ilovepitts

Your submission at Articles for creation: SARA JAY (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SARA JAY.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Libby norman (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ilovepitts, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: SARA JAY (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SARA JAY.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:27, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SARA JAY (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SARA JAY.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Jay (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Jay.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:30, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Jay

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Jay, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The user does not understand that this person does not pass PORNBIO, has been deleted three times in the mainspace. I have been falsely accused of bias multiple times, and I have tried to provide guidance to the user, but they cannot accept it. Not only is their insistence that she is notable disruptive, but it shows that they are unwilling to agree to consensus. If this CSD is declined, I will accept it and promptly AFD it, as there is no way that this passed any sort of notability guidelines.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:36, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Jay

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Jay, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Jay and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Jay during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

You are accused at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ilovepitts. Please review the policy on multiple accounts at WP:SOCK. If you are not abusing multiple accounts, I apologize for the error. Gigs (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sara Jay has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sara Jay. Thanks! MassiveYR ♠ 10:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited and I hope that it is now acceptable. Thanks. Ilovepitts (talk) 14:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Jay (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm going to disagree with the previous comment as none of these sources are remotely reliable or have in depth coverage and the 4+ semi-recent AFDs would suggest she is not notable even still.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Jay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am at a loss to understand Crissy... she is now in the Hall of Fame for AVN. That is the highest award you can get in the adult business. It qualifies per this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Pornographic_actors_and_models. The previous rejection was done by an editor.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ktr101 who has since been banned. Can you clarify how someone who is in the HALL OF FAME does not qualify? Thanks Ilovepitts (talk) 21:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Jay (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still no change regarding my last comment aside from more non-RS being added like blogs and imdb.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Jay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sara Jay, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sara Jay

Hello, Ilovepitts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sara Jay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 06:29, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Jay (December 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Gene93k was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The article was deleted by editor consensus at AfD multiple times, most recently at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Jay (4th nomination), and it has been protected against recreation. While the subject may pass the letter of WP:PORNBIO, the consensus is that, without significant coverage from quality sources, she still shouldn't get a Wikipedia article.

• Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sara Jay

Hello, Ilovepitts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sara Jay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 08:30, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monte Pittman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Body Count (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]