User talk:Immoral moralist

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

- - - W e l c o m e - - -

Hello, Immoral moralist! Thank you for your contributions. My name's Airplaneman and I just wanted to say hi and Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of the world's largest encyclopædia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name, the date and the time. If you are already loving Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field every time you edit. Again, welcome, and happy editing! Airplaneman ^talk 23:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Immoral moralist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no policy against having multiple usernames as long as you don't use them for deceptive purposes. I never used the same username on the same article. WP:Sock puppetry says: "A second account used deceptively in violation of this policy is known as a sock puppet." So the fact that this account and "Can I touch it" account are both me, doesn't make them "sock puppets." The reason stated in the block is "Abusing multiple accounts." Yet, no abuse has been shown or even alleged. Furthermore, these other usernames that are being claimed as me, no evidence has been given that they are me. Just claims. No diffs. Nothing. Is this how your justice system works?

Decline reason:

Users with a history of blocks for abusive sockpuppetry should avoid trying to game the system. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Immoral moralist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Last adminstrator declined to unblock sayin :"Users with a history of blocks for abusive sockpuppetry should avoid trying to game the system." Where is the history of blocks for abusive sockpuppetry? Does he understand the difference between an allegation and evidence?

Decline reason:

The difference between an allegation and evidence is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/RJII. Toddst1 (talk) 01:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Indeed: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RJII/Archive. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. HAHA. Those names aren't from me! Looks like a lot of users got screwed over! Too bad for them. You guys should REALLY be more careful. If all anyone has to do is throw allegations around, then the system just doesn't work. I guess you're going to add my usernames to the list. So silly! :D Immoral moralist (talk) 01:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RJII for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. The Four Deuces (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry? Sorry but you've got the wrong dude. Immoral moralist (talk) 05:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]