User talk:Imothana

Welcome!

Hello, Imothana, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Elsabe Theory, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -The Iceman (talk) 02:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elsabe Theory[edit]

Thank you for editing Wikipedia! One of your articles you recently created, "Elsabe Theory" has been nominated for speedy deletion via WP:CSD under paragraph A1, specifically meaning that there was not enough relevant information to identify the subject of the entire article. While Wikipedia does encourage bold editing, it is not the place for original research or a place for introduction of entirely new theories with no references. This may seem harsh, and, quite frankly, it may be, however Wikipedia is intended to be used as a tertiary reference, and NOT a collaboration of new ideas, or a publishing service. Do not take this in any way that your contributions are not appreciated, it is just that Wikipedia must strive for articles that are factual on a topic... nowhere in the article was "Elsabe Theory" ever referred to or explained, rather it launched into a monologue that sounded very much like a philosophical proposal. If this is not original research (meaning it is published in an established source somewhere) and it is licensed under CC-By-SA 3.0 and GDFL, please feel free to contest my request for deletion and justify your reason for extending your assigned article probation period. If you do not respond swiftly, chances are the article will be deleted within 30 minutes, or it may already have been as I am typing this very long message. Dont fret however, deleted pages are entirely recoverable with a request to a bureaucrat or another administrator, unless it has been specifically oversighted by a person of extraordinary trust. -The Iceman (talk) 02:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Coffee Corner Phenomena[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Coffee Corner Phenomena, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Prestonmag (talk) 21:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Coffee-Corner Phenomena[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Coffee-Corner Phenomena, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Hue Sat Lum 21:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Coffee-Corner Phenomena, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —Hue Sat Lum 00:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Coffee-Corner Phenomena. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Elassint ^Hi 00:22, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Coffee-Corner Phenomena. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Elassint ^Hi 00:26, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Imothana for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 00:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 00:34, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Coffee-Corner Phenomena[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Coffee-Corner Phenomena requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Scopecreep (talk) 02:08, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Coffee-Corner Phenomena[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Coffee-Corner Phenomena. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps:

Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says Click here to contest this speedy deletion.
This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 02:17, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Coffee-Corner Phenomena, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. West Eddy (talk) 02:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeatedly removing speedy deletion tags from articles you created. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (talk) 02:31, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coffee-Corner Phenomena[edit]

The article Coffee-Corner Phenomena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable "phenomena" (sic). No Google hits for "coffee corner phenomenon yemen", no non-Wikipedia hits for "coffee corner phenomena yemen".

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:41, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Coffee-Corner Phenomena for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coffee-Corner Phenomena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coffee-Corner Phenomena until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Scopecreep (talk) 06:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Coffee-Corner Phenomena, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. West Eddy (talk) 08:04, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Imothana. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (talk) 13:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]