User talk:Imperial Enjoyer

Welcome!

Hello, Imperial Enjoyer!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ambadeva Rebellion moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ambadeva Rebellion. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Please read WP:REFB and WP:CITE and place your references directly after the facts they cite. Readers need to have the easy ability to read your references rather than wondering what it is that they cite. I have moved it back to Draft to allow you to perform this task in peace and quiet. Once performed I believe you are welcome to move it back to main space. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Upparapalli moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Upparapalli. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Please read WP:REFB and WP:CITE and place your references directly after the facts they cite. Readers need to have the easy ability to read your references rather than wondering what it is that they cite. I have moved it back to Draft to allow you to perform this task in peace and quiet. Once performed I believe you are welcome to move it back to main space.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Baji Rao's Konkan Campaign moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Baji Rao's Konkan Campaign. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Please read WP:REFB and WP:CITE and place your references directly after the facts they cite. Readers need to have the easy ability to read your references rather than wondering what it is that they cite. I have moved it back to Draft to allow you to perform this task in peace and quiet. Once performed I believe you are welcome to move it back to main space. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doing the same thing three times...

...and expecting a different result is the path to madness.

Please read WP:REFB and WP:CITE and only migrate your drafts to mainspace when the references are placed to cute the individual facts. Having them in a clump at the end of a paragraph just will not do. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prataprudra's campaign against Ambadeva

I've moved that to Draft:Prataprudra's campaign against Ambadeva as there is no context whatsoever. The infobox says "Battle of Upparapalli" but that seems to be a different article based on what I see above. The article does not mention Prataprudra, but does mention Prataparudra so is Prataprudra an alternate spelling or a mistake? There is no mention of Ambadeva other than in the title. Is it about either of these people? You need links to other articles and some context. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your work

When you move a draft to Mainspace please:

Remove the AFC artefacts
Add to categories
provide inbound Wikilinks (if not already present)

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Malyala Chaunda moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Malyala Chaunda. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it requires a complete rewrite to meet WP:NPOV. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 💬 13:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Sod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ladakhi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Malthan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Malthan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it will require a complete rewrite to meet WP:NPOV. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 💬 18:49, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ladakh Rebellion (1835–1840), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dogra.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Izno (talk) 19:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imperial Enjoyer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Imperial Enjoyer (talk) 11:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Close empty request superseded by a new appeal below. Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

hello admin please reconsider your decision I am not doing any sock puppetry I forget to login when I am editing please it's a sincere request. Sorry for my actions Imperial Enjoyer (talk) 11:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 unblock request

@Asilvering:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imperial Enjoyer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello admin please reconsider your decision i am not @WhiteReaperPM you can investigate my edits see if it is anything related to this user please I just forget to login when I am editing I am not doing sock puppetry please it's my sincere request. Imperial Enjoyer (talk) 12:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You forgot to log in when editing, and that's why your edits are completely identical to the kinds of edits made by other logged-in users, like GroovyGrinster? -- asilvering (talk) 17:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply admin yes i forgot sometimes to login when i am editing articles and my articles are completely different from his you can investigate if i am saying truth or not Imperial Enjoyer (talk) 17:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think makes your articles are completely different from theirs? -- asilvering (talk) 20:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Admin! i created my articles on Dogra dynasty conflicts and militray commanders of Kakatiya dynasty I didn't create any articles related to Maratha Confederacy. Imperial Enjoyer (talk) 21:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain to me how you write your articles? What steps do you take to do the research and writing? How do you decide what topics to write about? -- asilvering (talk) 22:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, The range you edited your articles from has been very disruptive on various articles [1] such as introducing "Vassal state of Maratha confederacy" on 100s of princely state articles, all of which I had to revert manually . Ratnahastin (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]