User talk:Imperial avis

Welcome!

Hello, Imperial avis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Ken ^{talk|contribs} 23:00, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

Hi, please add copyright information to the files you uploaded, as you were requested to at the time you uploaded them. The files will be deleted if they are not compatible with Wikipedia's copyright. Joe D (t) 23:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:000 0508.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:000 0508.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:St_Mike's.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:St_Mike's.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:000 0508.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:000 0508.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kotepho 15:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Same goes for Image:000 0516.jpg, but you tagged a duplicate of 000 0508.JPG as a CC, is that the case with these other photos as well? Kotepho 15:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:K022107AU.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:K022107AU.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Empress of the French[edit]

Please stop interfering with the succession boxes for the French Empresses. Succession boxes are laid out sequentially from one person in the general role to the next person (i.e. one monarch to another, one consort to another). Henry VIII's succession box doesn't skip from him to James I, does it? Nor do we make up unused titles (have you ever heard the term 'royal consort of the French head of state' used?). Michael Sanders 11:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't. The average viewer wants to know who the previous and next consort was, not who was the last and next holder of a particular title. Now, we could use your innovation of 'consort to the head of state' - except we are not allowed to make up titles. So we use the sequential system, and assume that the reader will be capable of clicking along until he or she finds the next 'Empress of the French' - or s/he can click the link on the title and look it up on List of Queens and Empresses of France. Michael Sanders 11:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 'Empress consort of India' (i.e. consort of India) ceased to exist. Not the same at all. Michael Sanders 11:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because legally, the monarch of Great Britain wasn't sovereign over the state of India until Queen Victoria. The title 'Empress of the French' is the place-holder for 'consort of France' - but we quite specifically do not make up titles. So 'consort of the French head of state' is out. The 'Empress of the French' was in de facto terms the same as the 'Queen of the French', who was in de facto terms the same as the 'Queen of France and Navarre'. That's why they all have the same page. That's how we do things here. If you don't like it, try to change the roots of the system, don't meddle with the products which are by the rules correct. Michael Sanders 11:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Succession boxes are used to illustrate to the reader the passage of authority in the state, not the history of a particular title. Thus, Napoleon is succeeded as head of state by Louis XVIII, not by himself. And, I repeat, we don't use phony titles. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization, and find evidence that 'consort of the French head of state' is ever used. Until then, stop interfering with the boxes. Michael Sanders 11:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:K022107AU.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:K022107AU.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SVH06 2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SVH06 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UKIBSP 2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:UKIBSP 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:P4060162.jpg[edit]

Image:P4060162.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Huckford Viaduct.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Huckford Viaduct.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cassie suicide.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cassie suicide.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 17:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cassie suicide brandon.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Cassie suicide brandon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 17:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^{(talk)(review)} 17:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Cassie suicide.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Cassie suicide.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 17:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Civil Parish of Winterbourne [edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Civil Parish of Winterbourne , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Skinsmoke (talk) 10:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sue white hq.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sue white hq.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:St Mike's2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:St Mike's2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:22, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]