User talk:ImrichAF

ImrichAF, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ImrichAF! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Simpsons Movie have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Simpsons Movie was changed by ImrichAF (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870539 on 2021-03-27T20:50:52+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Every edit, or almost every edit, that you've made has been reverted as unencyclopedic. You've used disallowed sources like WatchMojo instead of WP:RS (click and read that). You are blasting Wikipedia with lots of needless content, with broken formatting and English usage like randomly capitalized words. Please stop editing until you understand what an encyclopedia is. Users can be blocked for all this. — Smuckola (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Super Mario Odyssey, you may be blocked from editing. You've already been warned not to use WatchMojo as a source. Stop adding this. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 22:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3rr

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 17:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. You've had a week of nothing but being reverted and warned, totally wasting the time of countless volunteers, with absolutely no response. Stop edit warring and personal attacks. You are *not* here to serve some fan community as you said in your insult, because this is an encyclopedia. WP:NOTHERE [1][2] — Smuckola (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Hi, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. While I sympathize that Wikipedia can take some time to learn, it looks like you are breaking multiple rules multiple times concurrently. Final warning. Your account will be blocked if any more of these occur.

Dont violate WP:NPA - no personal attacks or name calling.
Follow WP:V. Add sources that verify all info you add to Wikipedia.
Dont edit war. If there is a disagreement, follow WP:BRD and discuss on talk pages. Only make changes if there is a consensus to do so. Sergecross73 msg me 03:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

April 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 17:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sergecross73: Zero percent probability of ever stopping. — Smuckola (talk) 03:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 2 weeks. I gave you a final warning, and you've violated it again. I'm not sure what the disconnect is. You need to add sources whenever you add new content to Wikipedia. WP:REFB teaches you the extremely simple process. If you need help, ask. But opting out is not an option, it will just keep getting your account blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 12:54, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sergecross73: [3] — Smuckola (talk) 21:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked until you demonstrate that you understand how our sourcing policy works. (You are still allowed to edit this talk page, and may WP:PING me if it appears I'm not longer keeping an eye on this page. Sergecross73 msg me 21:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 44297

UTRS appeal #44297 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]