User talk:Indiansam007

Indiansam007, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Indiansam007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Singh Sahota has been accepted

Sanjeev Singh Sahota, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 07:09, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing disclosure required

Hello Indiansam007. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Indiansam007. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Indiansam007|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid Disclosure Query

Dear Sir/madam,

I have not and will not receive any money for the articles i create. The people i write about are notable asians who i believe should be included in wikipedia. I am fairly new to the wikipedia world and did not know if there was a limit on the number of articles i could contribute to. I do have a list of people i want to create pages for but these people are not related to me nor do they do know me. Most importantly i am not receiving any money at all. I am just an indian guy who wants to include notable asians in wikipedia. If you would like to discuss this further then i am available at any time. I hope my reply is satisfactory but if you need any more information then i would be glad to collaborate. Kind Regards Indiansam007 (talk) 13:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article deleted

After some due diligence ive realised that the person i have written about had a page deleted a while ago. I wasn't aware of that. Nevertheless i would like to reiterate that i am NOT on wikipedia to earn money. I want to get more notable Asians included and would like to know what the limit of submissions is? I have compiled a list of persons who i believe should be on wikipedia but do not want someone to flag me for believing i am charging for a service which i am absolutely not. If you can help me out that would be great and i am totally dedicated to complying with any requests or help you need from me. Kind Regards Indiansam007 (talk) 16:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sanjeev Singh Sahota

The article Sanjeev Singh Sahota has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable boxer - does not meet WP:NBOX

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PRehse (talk) 10:51, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]