User talk:Indulgent Author

Please add new threads to the bottom of the page.

March 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Futbol Club de Real Bigone. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jasper Deng (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jasper, these records (longest celibacy & smallest number of bollocks) on Futbol Club de Real Bigone are clearly examples of vandalism. These things are not relevant to a football team & should be removed. Indulgent Author (talk) 19:03, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This does not fall under vandalism's definition, and in addition, you broke the table formatting with those edits.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC) Indulgent Author (talk) 19:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that these are slander, they are not proven & people may take offence. Indulgent Author (talk) 19:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How? One thing is certain:You broke page formatting.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:09, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing the formatting, however smallest number of bollocks (Testicals) & celibacy have not relation to a football team, serve no benefit to the page & so should be removed. Indulgent Author (talk) 19:11, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then please do so without breaking the formatting.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise, thank you for fixing my oversight. Indulgent Author (talk) 19:15, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Indulgent Author. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind confirming that you control User:IndulgentReader? We generally limit users to one account, except in exceptional circumstances. --Addi hockey 10 ^e-mail 19:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not control IndulgentReader - Indulgent Author (talk) 12:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain why you completely compied IndulgentReader's talk page onto your own talk page? Is there any connection between you and IndulgentReader? Thanks, Spitfire^Tally-ho! 14:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]