User talk:Inei001

April 2024[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at History of the Quran. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 16:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have not provided any evidence as to how the Qur'an relies on several apocryphal sources. The citations for that section were especially poor as they do not provide any evidence whatsoever and they could not provide the name of the book they were citing.

It makes me wonder whether you have a significant bias against Islam which allows you to protect lies against the compilation of the Qur'an. I request that you revert the changes that I made to that section and, with all due respect, do better at your job. Inei001 (talk) 17:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've missed the point. I have no opinion on the content. Removing an entire section from an article with citations without appropriate explanation is almost always disruptive. Explain yourself at Talk:History of the Quran and solicit a consensus from other editors there. You can explain your objections based on reliable sources, including any criticisms of the currently cited sources. Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 17:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]