User talk:Innocentbadshah

Delete my contributions to Wikipedia as newly joined users are reviewers on my edits and I have no time and energy for such platform on which only specific type of people can rule and they can delete create warn and block when they wish them to be done!

2016

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for the work that you do maintaining our encyclopedia. Regards, Adam9007 10 April 2016 (UTC)

:Regards dear brother

FYI, that was left by an imposter. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:38, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ohhh @Bongwarrior Adam9007 is a true person and you are talking like this because he have deleted a lot of your fake pages :) there were several pages i have created when i was new at Wikipedia and Admins have deleted them, It does'nt meant that i will call them imposter or something like this, We should respect admins because they have responsibilty to take care of the world's most largest source of knowledge which is now a days Wikipedia

No, that was left by a blocked troll, User:Adam90007, not Adam9007. Doug Weller talk 18:36, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Syed Muhammad Masood, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Singing posts as different user, this is highly disruptive and will get you blocked - Mlpearc (open channel) 02:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear knowledge sharing is not vandalism, Please read the history i am not doing any vandalism i am putting infortaion about a tribe and people i have knowlegde--Syed Saqib Imad 03:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mashwanis. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Mlpearc (open channel) 02:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was just for information purposes

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Syed Muhammad Masood. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 03:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Mashwanis. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 03:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Innocentbadshah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kakar, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 18:32, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Mashwanis. Doug Weller talk 18:37, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have section headings that say "Invalid statements of Historians" or tell readers who the best historian is

I've reverted you at two articles for doing that. It's a violation of 2 core policies WP:NPOV and WP:VERIFY. Doug Weller talk 18:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Doug, What if someone is not fimilar woth a subject and then he write wrong information which is denied by scholars in every part of time??? No issues you reverted the changes, Please reserch on it and if you find that i am right so revert it again. Thanks Syed Saqib Imad 22:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

No. What we do is show all significant views. There are times when we are clear about the lack of validity of say Creationism, but that's rare in the subjects you are editing in. See also WP:Words to avoid. So we make it clear there are different views, but Wikipedia doesn't choose. Doug Weller talk 08:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 08:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gesudaraz I - you need to explain your changes, and you should not remove non-AH dates

AH dates are fine, but most readers won't understand them and have a right to know the dates in CE or AD. I don't know why you removed places of birth and death as you provided no edit summary. You removed text resulting in "He was the grand son of Syed Abdul Ghaffar was the prince or governor of Persia and devoted to Mysticism" which makes no sense. And your version gave him a different father. Doug Weller talk 08:08, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Doug, He is the son of Abdul Ghaffar and i have added the references, I already added the correct history of him with valid historical references. The title is made confused by a historian Naimatullah Harvi which is not fimilar with the subject. I again request you to reseach and if you find i am right so revert the changea. Thanks

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mashwanis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pashtun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Syed Adam Banuri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Syed Adam Banuri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanamonde (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

....@Vanamonde93, The page was about an important figure of 16th Century Islamic researcher, Author and a Sufi saint as well as he is the progenitor of a sayyid tribe living in Pakistan and India, Please help with restoration of page and make improvements. Hoping great from you, lets help people to know the facts instead of stories.18:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)~

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wardak (Pashtun tribe), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Link has been modified.

Speedy deletion nomination of Syed Omar Al’qa’ab

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Syed Omar Al’qa’ab requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Seraphim System ^(talk) 07:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Innocentbadshah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Syed Abdul Ghaffar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Syed Abdul Ghaffar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRehse (talk) 10:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Syed Jafar al-Qa’im

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Syed Jafar al-Qa’im requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kb03 (talk) 17:29, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’m removing it as it is nonsense

Against WP:MOS. Reverting again will count as WP:EDITWARRING. IWI (chat) 23:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So good! Is it upon you to decide that what is in sense and what is non-sense??? You are improving with this attitude??? If you wanna improve add something and donr remove this as people know about them who were live before 8 centuries. Undoing your edits! Come to improve dont for blaming and vandalism on Wikipedia.

No it’s not up to me, but consensus of the majority of editors. Some of the text I removed wasn’t even in English. IWI (chat) 23:18, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What the nonsense is this??? People have many languages in the world and written books in several languages, so what it mean foreign language??? Is Wikipedia is only for selected genealogy or type of people???

Please sign your comments with this ~~~~ at the end. This is the English language Wikipedia so it has to be in English. IWI (chat) 23:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! So do the improvements in real and translate all the text and titles of concerning books referring or refferenced to him in Wnglish!!!. Only ciations contains orignal text as researchs and authors written about him, the article is in English for improvement and make him reachable for evwryone wanna know about him.--Syed Saqib Imad 23:30, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Foreign language and text on Syed Soleman Shah. IWI (chat) 23:31, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now you are WP:EDITWARRING. You can’t put foreign text and calendars onto Wikipedia. I suggest you revert your changes or you may be blocked. IWI (chat) 23:33, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will never contribute more on Wikipedia as there is no reasonable rules or no desk to take solid and reasonable action on the users edits!

It’s very simple: translate it or don’t add it. You don’t have to be like that. If you want to make a complaint to admins about me, do so at the discussion on WP:ANI. IWI (chat) 23:44, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No need to contribute more! I am unable to translate million books to English!

Block me and delete my contributions as per your own wishes and rules

We don’t block editors unless they are a threat to the project. I can’t undo your contributions due to WP:3RR. Like I said, if you think I’ve done something wrong, feel free to report or discuss me on WP:ANI. We value everyone’s contributions and I have the full belief that you mean well. IWI (chat) 23:51, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is absolutely not my wish for you, or any user, to be blocked unless necessary. IWI (chat) 23:53, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You again reverted my edits as doing nonsense action! Because of u people just joined Wikipedia before 06 months and the administrators are taking your side because of ethnicity!!!! What the hell is this close this platform no need it if its only for special type of people or any specific ethnic group can only create and edit articles!!! Syed Saqib Imad 02:14, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

You just joined Wikipedia before 6 months and i am editing since 8 years! Very bad impression in present days as some specific group is administrating over pedia!!! Syed Saqib Imad 02:16, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Just undid your nonsense feom the reference page and reverted back

Nomination of Syed Soleman Shah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syed Soleman Shah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Soleman Shah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fish+Karate 12:38, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it and also delete me from Wikipedia as you and your user improvement both are going personal with me!!! What the nonsense you both are??? Nonsense peopke are how administrators???? Peopke should know about centuries ago alived people!!!

Removed your deletion tag from the page as its looks like nonsense to nominate the page for deletion created years ago!!! People should know about the others who were alive centuries ago.--Syed Saqib Imad 02:27, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Syed Soleman Shah. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:59, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why the discussion is needed for a page created years ago based on a user actions who has been joined just 6 months ago???

Don’t start this now please. For the record, I got a new account 6 months ago; I’ve been on here since 2014, not that it matters. Don’t get yourself blocked, removing templates and making subtle attacks on me doesn’t help anyone. IWI (chat) 11:31, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you think you have a good reason for the page not to be deleted, then you can vote: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Soleman Shah IWI (chat) 11:37, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Man you should delete my contributions you are wasting my time

December 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for perpetuating a hoax: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Soleman Shah, see also WP:ANI thread.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sandstein 15:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete my username i dont want to waste my time pn a platform where a cheap guy and his helpers are against me and being personal with me and deleting all my contributions. Just non-sense group of people--Syed Saqib Imad 19:51, 19 December 2018 (UTC)