Jump to content

User talk:Inot1991

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Inot1991, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Fayenatic London 17:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks! This information is super useful and I keep coming back to the links.

Really looking forward to making many contributions (hopefully) Inot1991 (talk) 09:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Middlesbrough[edit]

Hi there. Welcome to Wikipedia. I'm confused: with the greatest of respect, why would you go to the trouble of typing: Middlesborough Milk Rollers (that is, [[Middlesbrough Milk Rollers|Middlesborough Milk Rollers]]) when you could have just typed Middlesbrough Milk Rollers ([[Middlesbrough Milk Rollers]]) straight off and got an instantly better and more accurate result? I am honestly, I promise you, not trying to be rude or sarcastic here ... I just absolutely don't get it! Cheers 82.36.105.25 (talk) 22:05, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Complete and honest error. Thanks for pointing it out. Inot1991 (talk) 08:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant, and thanks for the nice reply. Best wishes 82.36.105.25 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance tags[edit]

Hello Inot1991: Please, do not remove maintenance tags as you did in The Mix (charity). The article is written in promotional tone (see WP:NOTADVERTISING) and relies mostly on non-independent sources. This was the result of conflict of interest editing. Your edits did not change this, so there is no reason to remove the tags. Best, --MarioGom (talk) 12:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


No worries. I thought it might have remedied it, but I'll re-look and source other references. Thanks for the feedback. Inot1991 (talk) 17:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]