Jump to content

User talk:Integrityrules17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sameer Wankhede (April 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Rusalkii (talk) 14:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Integrityrules17! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 14:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sameer Wankhede (April 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:26, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sameer Wankhede (April 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:44, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I added reputed independent secondary sources as reference like NDTV, Quint, Hindustan Times and more. Please check properly and consider the article. Thank you for your time. Integrityrules17 (talk) 13:51, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sameer Wankhede (April 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TheAafi was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Nothing has changed since Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sameer Wankhede
The Aafī (talk) 18:06, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe my article about Sameer Wankhede has all the necessary sources and references, still reviewers are not approving my article. The references I have given are reputed world over, the reason that reviewers are citing that "nothing has changed after review"- my reason is that I have changed reference section with all the independent world class secondary sources. The article has most of the basic details and it doesn't require any more change as of now I believe. Since, Wikipedia is not for promotion, I am not adding about his achievements to sound as if I am promoting him. I am very much neutral in my approach.


And, when it comes to the question of , does this article needs a Wikipedia page or not - it's needed . Sameer Wankhede is a popular figure. You can find so many government officers Wikipedia page and those are not even necessary because they were not even popular for taking actions. I don't know why you guys are repeatedly rejecting the article. I think a neutral decision is not taken when reviewing my article. Please ensure you take a neutral decision.

Integrityrules17 (talk) 05:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sameer Wankhede (April 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 06:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]