User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 6

Your submission at Articles for creation

Fetal heartbeat bill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tazerdadog (talk) 00:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Coming Together (advertisement) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rob Moodie

Fetal heartbeat bill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mother Jones

Joseph Bast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Edward Bushel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:00, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Cite doi template created in error?

It looks like you may have created a cite doi template in error. If not, please fill it in with appropriate information and post something here. I will remove the db-t3 notice. Here's the formal information.

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Cite doi/10.3945.2F.E2.80.8Bajcn.2010.29300

A tag has been placed on Template:Cite doi/10.3945.2F.E2.80.8Bajcn.2010.29300 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Peer review

Hi there- just to let you know, users are allowed only one open peer review at a time; I've mentioned your reviews here. J Milburn (talk) 13:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't know. Anyway, if there's some way to cancel all my requests except the ongoing one for 1,000 Years, then if you could either do it or tell me how to do it, that would be awesome.Jinkinson (talk) 14:03, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

No worries - I closed the other three. They can be re-opened one at a time, if desired. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 17:10, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jay Gordon (doctor)

The article Jay Gordon (doctor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be known for a single event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 02:33, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Stephen Bustin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to AAAS

Bonnie S. Dunbar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to AAAS

Diane Harper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Merck

Soda tax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Telluride

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)