User talk:InvisibleRefugee

Welcome!

Hello, InvisibleRefugee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Flat Out let's discuss it 12:01, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Ghmyrtle. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Institutional abuse seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:37, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Institutional abuse, you may be blocked from editing. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW" MY ASS!!! YOU ARE COVERING UP TORTURE AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING. THERE ARE TOO MANY VICTIMS OUT HERE AND IT CAN'T GO ON FOREVER

THIS IS FACTS! STOP PRETENDING IT IS NOT

WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN IS FACTS

PSYCHIATRY IS USED TO HIDE THE FACTS AND TORTURE PEOPLE, CONTINUALLY DENYING THE FACTS DOESN'T STOP THE FACTS FROM EXISTING

How is anyone here "covering up torture and human trafficking" by ensuring that articles are not written from your personal point of view? Human trafficking, Torture, Institutional abuse are just a few articles covering these topics however they are summaries of what reliable sources have to say rather than individuals deciding what the "truth" is. WP:NOT Flat Out let's discuss it 12:09, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is not about a "point of view", or individuals DECIDING [what a contestable] "truth" is. These are facts, and I am a reliable source. That is the entire point.

This is NOT a "personal analysis": it is hard cold facts.

Ok, I am finished, go ahead and do your erasure of facts. Institutions will continue to disturb people, feign innocence, point back at invalidated victims created, and claim the sole authority to credence. Bye.

InvisibleRefugee, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi InvisibleRefugee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]