Jump to content

User talk:Ionpalmasu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inappropriate vandalism warning[edit]

First, I would like to tell you, I do not have too much time and experience in working with wikipedia, because unlike some others, i work for living (so I am not experienced in talk or debating an article on wiki), but I do not agree when another user is taking advantage of his experinece in Wiki editing and eventually protect an article with no fair or well founded reason. So, with all the respect, what Dahn did is not accurate.

The removed sentence or words (in the both articles Ion Antonescu and Bombing of Bucharest in World War II as you warned) were only points of view (example of a POV: "This is not evidence that he recanted his anti-Semitism, but only that he began to realise that the war is lost and that he needed to find means to reconcile with the Allies" - this sentence is not describing a historical fact, it is just a POV and if it is not so, you will have to demonstrate it). As long as you will not bring a proof about your statements I will ask the supervisors for asisstance in removing protection and modifying the article.

As far as I know the rules mention that adding sentences which constitutes a Point Of View (as it was in the above mentioned articles and you added those sentences) especially for historical sensitive articles is against the foundation of Wikipedia.

Ionpalmasu 22:45, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning[edit]

Removing information and deliberately introducing POV into articles, as you did on Ion Antonescu and Bombing of Bucharest in World War II constitutes vandalism. Please stop or you may be blocked from editing wikipedia. Dahn 18:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request[edit]

{{editprotected}}

What exactly are you requesting? — Carl (CBM · talk) 00:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request[edit]

I request removal from this article of all the POV's (One of the examples are exposed at my previous paragraph), since it is not accurate historically. I like to think that wikipedia is an objective organisation and an equal opportunity publisher for every historical facts. Some facts described in this article are not accurate and modification is needed.

I ask for assistance since I am not very experienced in wikipedia.

Thank you in advance,

Ionpalmasu 17:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]