User talk:Iowacornfed
I find your assertions to be without merit on the Charles G. Koch article. Thank you. Collect (talk) 13:21, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Can you be more specific about why you consider them to be without merit? Also, was there a consensus of agreement with the addition of the ACLU donation reference in the first place (that I'm not finding)? Thank you. Iowacornfed (talk) 17:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- At this point, the apparent consensus is to list the ACLU donation. If you wish it removed, it behooves you to obtain a consensus thereon, or to make a case that the claim is specifically "contentious." WP:BLP/N is the noticeboard if you wish to make the claim and get input from outside editors. Thanks. Collect (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your consideration and assistance Iowacornfed (talk) 18:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- At this point, the apparent consensus is to list the ACLU donation. If you wish it removed, it behooves you to obtain a consensus thereon, or to make a case that the claim is specifically "contentious." WP:BLP/N is the noticeboard if you wish to make the claim and get input from outside editors. Thanks. Collect (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2011 (UTC)