User talk:Ipusco Luzon

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ipusco Luzon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Deepfriedokra: I'm not a sockpuppet, what's the proof?

Decline reason:

This addresses none of the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eiskrahablo. Yamla (talk) 14:16, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: Dear Yamla, I'm not even related to Eiskrahablo or whoever that is, you can even check through the tools on that investigation, I'm not a sockpuppet of that person. The only reason I was put on that list is because I perform my contribution here: [1], and what's wrong with that? what's wrong with being a constructive contributor who could provides factual and verifiable informations? why those verifiable informations should be removed? I'm pretty sure if someone else did any improvements on that article, they'll ended up on these Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eiskrahablo again even if that person has nothing to do with Eiskrahablo. (Ipusco Luzon (talk) 14:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Eiskrahablo per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eiskrahablo. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- RoySmith (talk) 14:31, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ipusco Luzon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@RoySmith: I am not related to Eiskrahablo, what's the base of you accusing me? is it because my contribution right here: [2]?

Decline reason:

Be careful, you don't get an unlimited number of appeals. You've wasted two on questions which aren't appeals. Cabayi (talk) 14:50, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.