Jump to content

User talk:Irish GAA DC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Irish GAA DC, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Irish GAA DC! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Squads

[edit]

Hey, what is too many? I agree tbh, but what is the magic number? Kante4 (talk) 15:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, yes. It is too many; perhaps we should pick just the notable ones? Besides the Décima squad, the other 2 retained seemed rather arbitrarily chosen. — Anakimilambaste   20:01, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Kante4: Courtesy pinging — Anakimilambaste   20:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I retained two purely for readability. Irish GAA DC (talk) 20:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I would include the 1998 squad instead of 2000, because it came 32 years after the previous. 1956 too perhaps, but there isn't enough text in that subsection. Not sure what to do about that. Any suggestions? — Anakimilambaste   20:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
La Decima and the next one are notable, as that was the first b2b team. Kante4 (talk) 20:42, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Having thought about it the Galacticos one in 2002 is notable when you consider that was an era that defined the club. The other it's a toss of a coin which (if any) goes in. Irish GAA DC (talk) 01:46, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So...1998, 2002, 2014, 2016, 2017?— Anakimilambaste   17:15, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Aims

[edit]

"Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing." Jimmy Wales

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a Cristiano Ronaldo fansite. There is no obligation to only include favourable content. Please try reviewing Wikipedia entries for other people - there is no reason Ronaldo's page should not be consistent with others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumpumpump (talkcontribs) 08:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]