User talk:Irreporter

Welcome!

Hello, Irreporter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Omid Amraei, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gobbleswoggler (talk) 14:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Omid Amraei

A tag has been placed on Omid Amraei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Gobbleswoggler (talk) 14:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

Two different administrators, myself and NawlinWiki, have removed this article because it gives no indication of notability ,and because we have not being able to find ay sources that might support it. Please do not enter it again unless you have references providing substantial coverage to show notability , references from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. DGG ( talk ) 05:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:30, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to userspace

I moved the article for the event to your userspace, but there were multiple issues with it.

First off, it came off as promotional in tone. Phrases such as "emphasis on making a great deal of effort for better understanding of art and taking advantage of it for a better life and coexistence" and "moving towards the human values" are seen as promotional. Phrases such as "the greatest multinational artistic event in Middle East" are considered to be unambiguously promotional. Let's put it this way: phrases such as these are almost always a matter of opinion and things people say in order to make people think well of whatever they're talking about. You have to phrase things neutrally and in an encyclopedic manner. The only time you can ever say things such as "the greatest" is if you have multiple reliable sources referring to it as such. Even then you have to phrase it very, very carefully in order to avoid it seeming as if Wikipedia is endorsing something as the greatest ever.

Secondly, and most importantly, the festival has no coverage in reliable sources. By reliable sources I mean that it has received coverage in things that are independent of the subject (the festival) and are considered to be trustworthy as far as Wikipedia is concerned. I need to put an emphasis on Wikipedia, as something that you might see as trustworthy might not necessarily be so on here. Blogs aren't usable as reliable sources except in very rare circumstances. The only time they're usable is when you have something by someone that is so overwhelmingly notable and so much of an authority that they would be seen as a reliable source. However, if that person is involved with the festival then they would be seen as a WP:PRIMARY source and they can not give notability to the article. I just can't find anything that shows that this festival is notable. It's only been active for about a year or two, so this is probably why. We can't have articles on subjects that haven't received coverage and Wikipedia is not here to make up for this lack of coverage. Articles should be added to the mainspace after they receive coverage and not before.

In any case, you can find the article at User:Irreporter/Afdesta Online Festival. I've edited it down to a basic stub and have removed the promotional material. There still aren't sources, but that's because none of the ones that were previously on the article were usable and I couldn't find any to replace them. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:26, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]