User talk:IsaNew

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I've created a new article in my sandbox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IsaNew/sandbox but don't seem to find a way to embed an existing logo into the article. The logo I would like to embed is this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/5/50/Studex_Logo_black.jpg It is being used for the German article: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studex I tried embedding it by clicking on the Embed icon, inserted the file name https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/5/50/Studex_Logo_black.jpg, entered "Studex logo" as caption, clicked on Insert. (Also tried just the file name.) What am I doing wrong?

IsaNew (talk) 13:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the intricacies of copyright, non-free images must be uploaded separately to each Wikipedia project that is to show the image; the English Wikipedia cannot use a non-free image from the German Wikipedia. However, the non-free content criteria on the English Wikipedia require that non-free images may only be used in live articles (and they must be used, we can't have unused non-free images); a draft is not enough. Thus I'd suggest you focus on improving the draft (additional references will likely be required to show that the company meets the English Wikipedia's standards of notability) and upload the image only when the draft has been reviewed and turned into a live article. At that point you can use the English Wikipedia's File Upload Wizard to upload the image locally, and then you can add it to the article. Huon (talk) 20:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Huon! (Hoping this reply finds you.) IsaNew (talk) 12:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Studex (November 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Studex and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! IsaNew, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Studex has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Studex. Thanks! Worldbruce (talk) 16:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Studex (January 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Let the subject garner in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources and then re-submit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Studex and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Studex, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dial911 (talk) 21:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]