User talk:Isaacnymy

This is Isaacnymy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nymy Media (November 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Njd-de was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

– NJD-DE (talk) 23:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Isaacnymy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – NJD-DE (talk) 23:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odwako Isaac (December 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odwako Isaac and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:26, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Isaacnymy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 21:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

An article you recently created, Nymy Media 2, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. Please submit your article through WP:AfC instead of publishing to mainspace when you have a WP:COI. Silikonz💬 16:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declaring COI[edit]

Hello. If you are being paid by Nymy Media to your contributions of Wikipedia, please disclose them now per the instructions at Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. This is required by the WMF terms of use. Also avoid creating articles directly in the namespace. Try to run them through the WP:AfC process so that they can be reviewed for promotional material. Thanks. Silikonz💬 17:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Isaac. Please note that this is required - you appear to be creating quite a few articles closely related to your employer. Silikonz💬 13:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nymy Media (February 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The AfD for this ended just a few days ago. Resubmitting this, especially with a likely WP:COI is not acceptable.

CNMall41 (talk) 05:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isaacnymy (talk) 09:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JJMC89,

I am writing to request that my editor account on Wikipedia be unblocked. My account was blocked for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines, and I understand that this is a serious violation of Wikipedia's policies.

I want to assure you that I did not intend to violate Wikipedia's policies and that I take these policies very seriously. I understand that Wikipedia is a community-driven platform and that my actions could have a negative impact on the platform and its users.

In hindsight, I can see that my actions were not in line with Wikipedia's policies, and I deeply regret any harm that they may have caused. I have reviewed Wikipedia's conflict of interest and notability guidelines and I am committed to following them in the future.

If it is possible, I would appreciate the opportunity to make amends and continue to contribute to Wikipedia. I understand that the decision to unblock my account is ultimately up to the discretion of the Wikipedia Support Team, and I respect their decision either way.

Thank you for taking the time to review my request. I appreciate your consideration and I look forward to hearing back from you soon. Isaacnymy (talk) 18:38, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isaacnymy (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Yayo (February 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at African Yayo instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:African Yayo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]