User talk:Ishita1119
May 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Notre Dame College, Dhaka have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 11:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Adamjee Jute Mills, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Notre Dame College, Dhaka, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:19, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Ok. Thank you very much. Ishita1119 (talk) 16:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
I thought they were minor changes. And all the edits I have done, they are not false. By the way, next time I will be more careful. Ishita1119 (talk) 16:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, Ishita1119! Thank you for your contributions. I am Vinegarymass911 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or . Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Since you've shown some interest in editing topics related to Bangladesh, we hope you'll stay and add content to Bangladesh related articles. A number of important articles related to Bangladesh are yet to be created and many of the existing ones are in poor shape. You can help it improve by becoming a regular editor with adhering to the policies of Wikipedia. Consider joining or watchlisting Bangladesh related discussions (for example, Noticeboard for Bangladesh-related topics).
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Appeal to unblock[edit]
Ishita1119 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
caught by an opon proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 144.48.108.234 Place any further information here. Ishita1119
Decline reason:
That IP address is not blocked and you are able to edit. Please do not waste our time like this. Yamla (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nomination of Steve Dabilz for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Dabilz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Dabilz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZLEA T\C 19:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2020[edit]
Your addition to Steve Dabilz has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ZLEA T\C 13:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ishita1119, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
ZLEA T\C 17:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Notice of sockpuppetry block[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 23:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Ishita1119 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was unaware of the stockpupetry and thus made this offence. Yes, I have made a mistake, I am solely responsible for that and I am repentant for this now. I was totally ignorant of the fact.If I knew, it will led to such effect, I would never do it.I vow not to commit such offence again and I wish to contribute to the Wikipedia again.I hope , the administration would kindly lift over the ban and let me contribute to the encyclopedia.I made a mistake and I am remorseful. Please kindly consider that mistake happens and peole learn from this.I have previously contributed in Wikipedia with a good performance. I am requesting you to give me a second chance.This time,I will abide by all the rules of Wikipedia. I promise not to make such mistakes again
Decline reason:
Sorry, but we don't need more spammers and sock puppeteers on Wikipedia. We already have enough. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock discussion[edit]
Your claim is that you were unaware that your use of multiple accounts was improper; however, you appear to have used multiple accounts at this deletion discussion to make it look like there was more support for keeping the article than there actually was. This strikes me as inherently dishonest behavior, and in my view it is a serious breach of community trust. In order for us to review your unblock request more thoroughly, can you please list all of the registered accounts you have ever used to edit Wikipedia? Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 18:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
I have used 3 accounts only. They are Ishita1119 Arnobrac Zahirsaaz Zahirsaaz isnot opened on my phone. It was opened on my brother's phone.Ishita1119
- So, to reviewing administrators, the checkuser data here is consistent with what Ishita1119 is saying. The person behind the Ishita1119 account is only in control of two other accounts: Arnobrac and Zahir1959. Based on a conversation I had with Ishita1119 on #wikipedia-en-unblock connect, I suspect that Ishita1119, Dodolzk, Amr gamal eldin, and all the other accounts that are trying to push an article about Steve Dabliz—these are all separate people who were independently recruited by someone to write the Steve Dabliz article in a undisclosed paid editing scheme. Importantly, it appears Ishita1119 is not the one pulling the strings here; it seems they were the ones that were recruited by someone else and thus should not necessarily be held responsible for the actions of the other accounts. The whole scheme is still a violation of the meat puppetry policy, and I suspect this account should probably remain blocked for that reason (specifically, the policy states:
A new user who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, may be subject to the remedies applied to the user whose behavior they are joining. Sanctions have been applied to editors of longer standing who have not, in the opinion of Wikipedia's administrative bodies, consistently exercised independent judgment.
), but I wanted to explain what I think the situation is. I think Wikipedia:Standard offer is probably the best solution here. Mz7 (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Will you please kindly consider that I have also edited some articles voluntary? I have also created an article which is completely voluntary. My sole purpose of creating an account isto contribute in Wikipedia. I admit that I once made a mistake. But I request you to kindly consider my previous contributions like creating Jalladkhana Killing field. I hope you'll consider all the information and my pledge to forgive.Ishita1119
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ishita1119, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
ZLEA T\C 12:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I was blocked for sock puppetry. I was fully unaware of that thing and promised not to do such things again. So, I submitted an appeal . But today I found an email where I was informed that another sockpupetry investigation has been open. This time I haven't done anything and don't know the alleged account. But as a blocked user, I can't defend− myself in the investigation process. Is there any way by which I can comment? Again, will it make any impact on my review request?
- If it turns out that I was wrong about that other account, it will not impact your review request. If you didn't create that account, then you have nothing to worry about. - ZLEA T\C 13:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Please do not use the help me template to try and expedite block reviews. Praxidicae (talk) 13:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ishita1119, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
ZLEA T\C 20:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Suggested reading[edit]
I suggest you read this "rule" before you decide to create another sockpuppet account and write an article about yourself. - ZLEA T\C 20:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC) I don't know why you consider every account that has contributed in Steve dabliz as me. This account was not mine like previous time. Ishita1119
- Can you give me a logical explanation for why two accounts created an article that had not been created before about a non-notable person within days of each other? - ZLEA T\C 02:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- I have given my explanation to an wikipedia admin about that. Perhaps , Steve dabliz requested other people to create his account ,maybe offering money. I am not steve dabliz , so ,I don't know about him properly.Ishita1119
- I don't understand anything about what to do now. I was new to wikipedia. I made a mistake unwittingly. But ,I am now remorseful of that.Ishita1119
ANI[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - ZLEA T\C 23:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)