User talk:Isida1028

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Isida1028, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Image uploads[edit]

Hi Isida1028. You have uploaded a number of images that are the copyright of various websites. Every image you uploaded has been deleted, to ensure no copyright violations remain. Please read our copyright policy, and how to tag your images, before uploading any more images. Any further uploading of copyrighted images may result in your account being blocked. Neil  10:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image sizes[edit]

Hi - I notice you've been insisting an image on the Tokyo page should be 130px because it's the "right" size (or something). Not all people use the same font size, or the same browser, or the same window size, or even the same Wikipedia skin, any of which may affect the layout of images with respect to nearby text. So the size that's right for you may not be right for all users. In addition, Wikipedia's software allows individual users to override the default thumbnail image width, partly as an accessibility consideration (a vision impaired user might set their default browser font size as well as their default thumbnail image width quite large). Setting an explicit image width overrides not just the standard default, but each individual's preference as well. This is why the manual of style strongly recommends not overriding the default image width, except in extremely unusual circumstances. This image is not an extremely unusual circumstance (it's just portrait oriented rather than landscape). Please don't add an explicit size again. -- Rick Block (talk) 01:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adding extra space is similarly not a great solution. Try shrinking your browser's window width to about 2/3 of what you usually use and let me know what you think. HTML (let alone wiki markup) is not for typesetting. Trying to optimize appearance for one browser, skin, window width, and font size generally creates problems at least as bad for other browsers, skins, window widths, or font sizes. -- Rick Block (talk) 15:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

Would you stop exchanging pictures selfishly and carelessly?---- Tyangarin (talk) 22:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to say the same word for you. Could you specifically explain why your decision is better than mine? Why are pictures and its size that you chose adequate? Personally, I think that having only the picture of Nobunaga Oda is not enough to explain Japanese history. Although there is another Japanese history article, we might be able to add 1 or 2 more pictures in this section in order to summarize Japanese history using an image. Plus, both picture of the Emperor and the prime minister are extremely low quality. It seems that the pictures are shaken and out of focus. It should be changed others better than the current. Additionally, size of all pictures are obviously inadequate. They are too big and might break the proportion of the article. Finally, I'm considering you and other editors. Even though I don't think that Nobunaga Oda is the most important person in Japanese history, I didn't change the picture, because I thought, for English speakers, he is an important person in J/H [obviously, the picture of the atomic bombing is more important]. In short, I properly respect you and am not selfish.---- isida1028 November 20 2007, 16:00 (UTC)

Where have you got the "2006 Statistics" from? Eliko (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of cities by GDP. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities by GDP. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yoko Horiuchi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]