User talk:Itsnotironic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome![edit]

Hello, Itsnotironic, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review[edit]

Your article on Obelisks has been peer reviewed! 5734hls (talk) 00:13, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

General info[edit]

Whose work are you reviewing?

Itsnotironic

Link to draft you're reviewing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Itsnotironic/Obelisk?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Obelisk

Evaluate the drafted changes[edit]

  • Lead Section
    • Your lead section is clear and concise, though I might like to see more about the religious and cultural significance in this section
  • Structure Clarity
    • The structure flows well from ancient to modern, though I would like to see a section with more photos, as well as maybe a section specifically for religious beliefs/practices
  • Coverage Balance
    • I noticed that your article has really good coverage balance so far!
      • It is a bit shorter than the original, but I am assuming you are not quite finished yet!
    • I really appreciate how detailed each section is, and I like the separation between each kind of ancient Obelisk - it helps to differentiate the symbolism of each and to deter generalization
  • Content Neutrality
    • Your content is very neutral, I don't see any issues here!
  • Source Reliability
    • Your draft doesn't have any sources or references attached at the bottom yet, but I can assume that is still in the works!

5734hls (talk) 00:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Obelisk have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Obelisk was changed by Itsnotironic (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860048 on 2023-03-11T00:46:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]