User talk:Itsyourimran

This is Itsyourimran's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammad Mohsin (Bangladeshi Cricketer) (April 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kashmorwiki was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohammad Mohsin (Bangladeshi Cricketer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mohammad Mohsin (Bangladeshi Cricketer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 16:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itsyourimran! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 16:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iqbal Hossain Rony moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Iqbal Hossain Rony, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 06:03, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangla Cine Award[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bangla Cine Award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ahmetlii (talk) 20:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Afrin Sultana Laboni[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Afrin Sultana Laboni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ahmetlii (talk) 20:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Afrin Sultana Laboni for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afrin Sultana Laboni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afrin Sultana Laboni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ahmetlii (talk) 08:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Hello Itsyourimran. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Afrin Sultana Laboni, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Itsyourimran. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Itsyourimran|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:13, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:57, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

GeneralNotability (talk) 17:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Itsyourimran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven’t published any articles for paid or anything. In my articles I have given real informations sources and other things.I think admin will check everything and will unblock me

Itsyourimran (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sock puppet of globally locked editor User:Abdullahalimran001, who was locked for spamming. It looks like you've been spamming Wikipedia for a while, though. For example, you hijacked an article on Wikidata to make it about yourself: wikidata:Special:Diff/1173871248/1286832680. And in Special:Diff/970432732, you hijacked an English Wikipedia article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me username itsyourimran[edit]

Unblock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Itsyourimran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven’t published any articles for paid or anything. In my articles I have given real informations sources and other things.I think admin will check everything and will unblock me.I haven’t promoted anything also.And If I did anything wrong then didn’t do from this username. Hopefully you will remove my block

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Itsyourimran

Why my one article has been removed??[edit]

I have submitted an article named Iqbal Hossain Rony. Who is a Bangladeshi first class cricketer. His Wikipedia was approved. Now am not geeting this.why?? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iqbal_Hossain_Rony why admins are doing this with me?

Please remove your misunderstanding and unblock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Itsyourimran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello.This is itsyourimran.Recently I have published two of my articles.One of them named Iqbal Hossain Rony, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iqbal_Hossain_Rony Which got approval and comes out with google.But suddenly last day I saw someone put copyright on my photos and said I stolen those.But I have captured their photos and tose are mine.Today I see soneone redirected my that approved article and said I did paid work which is totally false.I did by my self. And I got block from Wikipedia with fake reason.I havent took any money for work.I havent put any copyrighted photos. I hope admins will re-cheack again and will unblock me. Then I put Second article, for that i got blocked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrin_Sultana_Laboni she is a notable and well known.She did koshai(2021) movie. But i saw one admin said koshai released on 1980!! That was another movie. Maybe admin didn’t check. She has lots of national newses and award. Then I got blame of using multiple accounts which is wrong.I used only this. Before I used another account, but i forget thats password. At last I wish admins will see my talk box and will consider me to unblock. Thanks

Decline reason:

This does not seem to address your undisclosed paid editing or undisclosed conflict of interest. Additionally, you are contradicting yourself. You say you have only used this account and then in the very next sentence, you indicate this is a lie and have indeed used another account. Yamla (talk) 13:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Itsyourimran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello,I haven’t used any other accounts,Thats true.I dont know I will proof it.And which informations I have providen in my articles all are notable and real.I have only used this account.I had an account but I lost that password and thats why I created this.And if this is a problem then I dont know whats sould I do.But as I forgotten thats password I havent used that account in editing. My one approved article has diverted and not showing as before. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iqbal_Hossain_Rony pls unblock me and keep it as before.As I wanna be an Wikipedian am editing by my self. After all of these if I do any mistakes unconsciously, I am sorry I will be alert for the next time. But please unblock me.And help me to be a wikipedian

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed sockpuppetry to Abdullah Al Imran (Cyber Security Specialist). The above statements are therefore false. This user has indeed used other accounts. --Yamla (talk) 13:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brother pls unblock me[edit]

{{unblock|reason:Hello.I told that I forgotten that another accounts password and thats why I created this.If its my mistake then sorry.I wont make anything if I forget password though. I apologise for my all mistakes now kindly unblock me.}}

Given your attempt to deceive us, there's no reasonable chance you'll be unblocked at this time. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. At that point, you'll need to address your undisclosed paid editing and undisclosed conflict of interest, as well as your attempt to deceive us. --Yamla (talk) 15:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will loss my flow to work in Wikipedia if I stuck in this block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Itsyourimran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello admins I pardon my all mistakes and humbly requesting a chance.Hope you will consider me and will unblock me. Please dont reduce my hope,If I did any mistakes then forgive it and as the last chance unblock me

Decline reason:

Your best chance of being unblocked is to take the standard offer and wait 6 months without sock puppetry before making another unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 12:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: @PhilKnight: and @Jpgordon: Also please note that I suspect Nurjahan212 as the sock of Itsyouriman as I think both are same person. I presented my evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Itsyourimran. Thanks. — A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 11:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Itsyourimran, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

— A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 07:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bangla Cine Award[edit]

Hello, Itsyourimran. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bangla Cine Award, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mohammad Mohsin (Bangladeshi Cricketer)[edit]

Hello, Itsyourimran. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mohammad Mohsin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bangla Cine Award[edit]

Hello, Itsyourimran. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bangla Cine Award".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]