User talk:Iubrecording

WITIC

He, is there a official website for WITIC?--Techfast50 (talk) 21:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Super Audio CD. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected. Thanks!Iubrecording (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring behavior

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Super Audio CD. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:05, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Super Audio CD

Looking at your edits to the above article, they give the impression that you are attempting to 'spin' the article to give a pro-SACD slant. Note that Wikipedia does not have an opinion (see WP:NPOV), and non-neutral edits will be removed. Furthermore you have been removing referenced material without discussion, and some of the references you've been adding are inadequate for verification purposes (such as bare links to sacd.net).

It might be a good idea if you broadened your editing horizons to other areas; you would be able to gain a wider picture of how Wikipedia works, and in general terms if one is unable to treat a subject dispassionately it's sound practice to avoid editing in that area. The SACD article has been the victim of a significant amount of advocacy in the past that has detracted from its value and credibility, and although I'm sure it's not your intent, your edits seem to be tending in the same direction. Should the trend continue, the article will be rolled back and locked, and the editor(s) responsible blocked. EyeSerene^talk 13:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. I've replied on the article talk page to keep all discussion related to the article together. EyeSerene^talk 00:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for looking over the Super Audio CD article and helping us update the links and add more references giving the Wikipedia article a more clear picture of Super Audio CD’s adoption rate and current status. In particular, your link to new Amazon SACD recordings and to a September 2009 Stepeophile article have helped keep the article up-to-date with the latest information about SACD. Samboy (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]