User talk:Ivp.office

Proposed deletion of Ivan V. Polyakov[edit]

Hello, Ivp.office. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ivan V. Polyakov, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Ivan V. Polyakov to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing[edit]

Hello Ivp.office. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ivp.office. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ivp.office|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit on my page. If you wouldn't mind also responding to the above comment about paid editing and conflict of interest. Wikipedia highly discourages conflict of interest editing, and while adding reliable sources to an article will stop the BLP PROD process, your article can still be deleted through other processes if it is determined that it is promotional or that the individual does not meet our general or biographical notability guidelines. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dear TonyBallioni, thank you very much for your comments. I've replied on your talk page. I'm not gettting any compensation and this article is a personal initiative for translation of article in Russian.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Polyakov (January 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is simply a business PR listing and none of it is significant enough to satisfy our standards, there's also no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else regardless.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivan Polyakov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ivan Polyakov has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ivan Polyakov. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 04:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ivan Polyakov[edit]

Hello, Ivp.office. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ivan Polyakov".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Polyakov (March 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This autobiographical draft has no references. It reads like a resume. It does not establish notability. The submission of autobiographical drafts is discouraged.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivan Polyakov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ivan Polyakov, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:32, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ivp.office! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:32, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ivp.office, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

To keep up to date with interesting news and developments, you may also wish to subscribe to The Signpost, our illustrated monthly newspaper, and have it delivered directly to your talk page.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MAXNP (talk) 10:48, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]